Figures & data
Table 1. Variables in 33 central composite face-centered design (CCFD) for CZTable Footnotea polymeric micelles.
Table 2. Factors’ levels for the 33 central composite face-centered design (CCFD) used to prepare CZ polymeric micelles.
Table 3. The measured responses of the central composite face-centered design (CCFD) of CZ polymeric micelles (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 1. In vitro CZ release profiles from investigated polymeric micelle and the drug solution in ethanol:water (1:1) at 37 ± 0.5 °C, mean ± SD, n = 3.
![Figure 1. In vitro CZ release profiles from investigated polymeric micelle and the drug solution in ethanol:water (1:1) at 37 ± 0.5 °C, mean ± SD, n = 3.](/cms/asset/61494dfd-be25-438e-9e7f-d0715768bbc2/idrd_a_1223216_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 4. Fitting CZ release to zero, first, and Higuchi diffusion models.
Figure 2. DSC thermograms of CZ, Pluronic® P123, Pluronic® L121, and the optimized polymeric micelle (PM7).
![Figure 2. DSC thermograms of CZ, Pluronic® P123, Pluronic® L121, and the optimized polymeric micelle (PM7).](/cms/asset/d17cd4d1-dfc9-4ed1-affd-13ccd27ac826/idrd_a_1223216_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Photomicrographs of the anterior segments of sheep nasal mucosa treated with pH 6.4 PBS (negative control, a), isopropyl alcohol (positive control, b), and CZ-loaded polymeric micelles (c) (100×).
![Figure 4. Photomicrographs of the anterior segments of sheep nasal mucosa treated with pH 6.4 PBS (negative control, a), isopropyl alcohol (positive control, b), and CZ-loaded polymeric micelles (c) (100×).](/cms/asset/aa79075a-0928-487c-a571-f579b287d370/idrd_a_1223216_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. Photomicrographs of the posterior segments of sheep nasal mucosa treated with pH 6.4 PBS (negative control, a), isopropyl alcohol (positive control, b), and CZ-loaded polymeric micelles (c) (100×).
![Figure 5. Photomicrographs of the posterior segments of sheep nasal mucosa treated with pH 6.4 PBS (negative control, a), isopropyl alcohol (positive control, b), and CZ-loaded polymeric micelles (c) (100×).](/cms/asset/98f0c41d-7874-4ff1-9b59-3da01345e821/idrd_a_1223216_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Variation of the radiochemical yield of 99mTc-clonazepam as a function of clonazepam amount (a), Na2S2O4 amount (b), pH (c), reaction temperature, (d) and time (e).
![Figure 6. Variation of the radiochemical yield of 99mTc-clonazepam as a function of clonazepam amount (a), Na2S2O4 amount (b), pH (c), reaction temperature, (d) and time (e).](/cms/asset/9ef2f646-c347-4b99-bb40-29d66071a6f7/idrd_a_1223216_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7. CZ concentration in brain at different time intervals following administration of intranasal 99mTc-CZ solution, intranasal 99mTc-PM7 and intravenous 99mTc-PM7, mean ± SD, n = 3, in male Swiss albino mice.
![Figure 7. CZ concentration in brain at different time intervals following administration of intranasal 99mTc-CZ solution, intranasal 99mTc-PM7 and intravenous 99mTc-PM7, mean ± SD, n = 3, in male Swiss albino mice.](/cms/asset/480074ef-441d-4430-9d5d-5298f56f7b84/idrd_a_1223216_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8. CZ concentration in blood at different time intervals following administration of intranasal 99mTc-CZ solution, intranasal 99mTc-PM7 and intravenous 99mTc-PM7, mean ± SD, n = 3, in male Swiss albino mice.
![Figure 8. CZ concentration in blood at different time intervals following administration of intranasal 99mTc-CZ solution, intranasal 99mTc-PM7 and intravenous 99mTc-PM7, mean ± SD, n = 3, in male Swiss albino mice.](/cms/asset/de611898-a2e1-4326-b2c0-1219cad09134/idrd_a_1223216_f0008_c.jpg)