Figures & data
Figure 1. Tissue distribution of PLGA nanoparticles after oral administration in mice. (A) Experimental protocol. C57BL/6J mice were treated orally with ICG or Nano-ICG. Alive mice were non-invasively imaged by FMT at 1.5 h, 3 h, 1, 2, 3 and 4 day after treatment. Tissue distribution of ICG (B) and Nano-ICG (C) were evaluated for 4 days after oral administration. The color scale bar is represented in arbitrary unit from blue (low intensity of fluorescence signal) to red (high intensity of fluorescence signal).
![Figure 1. Tissue distribution of PLGA nanoparticles after oral administration in mice. (A) Experimental protocol. C57BL/6J mice were treated orally with ICG or Nano-ICG. Alive mice were non-invasively imaged by FMT at 1.5 h, 3 h, 1, 2, 3 and 4 day after treatment. Tissue distribution of ICG (B) and Nano-ICG (C) were evaluated for 4 days after oral administration. The color scale bar is represented in arbitrary unit from blue (low intensity of fluorescence signal) to red (high intensity of fluorescence signal).](/cms/asset/53f0f0de-c979-4a8f-8b4c-4dd68f7015df/idrd_a_1279237_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Effects of Nano-Orz on body weight and blood glucose level in ob/ob mice. Effects of regular γ-oryzanol (320 μg/g body weight/day) (A) and Nano-Orz (0.01 and 0.1 μg/g body weight/day) (B) on body weight in ob/ob mice. Effects of regular γ-oryzanol (C) and Nano-Orz (D) on blood glucose levels in ob/ob mice in the fed state. (E) Effects of Nano-Orz (0.01 and 0.1 μg/g body weight/day) on plasma insulin levels. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control mice. ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) was used.
![Figure 2. Effects of Nano-Orz on body weight and blood glucose level in ob/ob mice. Effects of regular γ-oryzanol (320 μg/g body weight/day) (A) and Nano-Orz (0.01 and 0.1 μg/g body weight/day) (B) on body weight in ob/ob mice. Effects of regular γ-oryzanol (C) and Nano-Orz (D) on blood glucose levels in ob/ob mice in the fed state. (E) Effects of Nano-Orz (0.01 and 0.1 μg/g body weight/day) on plasma insulin levels. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with control mice. ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) was used.](/cms/asset/8a46723a-37e4-4aa1-9423-54d11dc49311/idrd_a_1279237_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Effects of Nano-Orz on glucose homeostasis in ob/ob mice. Blood glucose levels and AUC during GTT in mice treated with regular γ-oryzanol (A) and Nano-Orz (B) for 2 weeks. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8). †† p < 0.01 compared with ob/+ mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with Nano-Vehicle-treated mice. ANOVA and repeated-measures ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) were used. (C) Levels of mRNA in the hypothalamus are shown for Chop, ERdj4 and Xbp1s. The mRNA levels were determined using real-time PCR. Values were normalized to that of 18S rRNA. (D) IHC analyses of isolated pancreatic islets. Serial paraffin-embedded sections were stained with anti-insulin, anti-glucagon and anti-cleaved caspase-3 antibodies. Scale bar, 20 μm; magnification, ×400. (E–H) Mean islet size (E) and the ratios of insulin-positive area (F), glucagon-positive area (G) and cleaved caspase-3-positive area (H) to the total islet area were calculated (n = 3; 156–203 islets), respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, versus control mice. ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) was used. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the differences between two groups.
![Figure 3. Effects of Nano-Orz on glucose homeostasis in ob/ob mice. Blood glucose levels and AUC during GTT in mice treated with regular γ-oryzanol (A) and Nano-Orz (B) for 2 weeks. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8). †† p < 0.01 compared with ob/+ mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with Nano-Vehicle-treated mice. ANOVA and repeated-measures ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) were used. (C) Levels of mRNA in the hypothalamus are shown for Chop, ERdj4 and Xbp1s. The mRNA levels were determined using real-time PCR. Values were normalized to that of 18S rRNA. (D) IHC analyses of isolated pancreatic islets. Serial paraffin-embedded sections were stained with anti-insulin, anti-glucagon and anti-cleaved caspase-3 antibodies. Scale bar, 20 μm; magnification, ×400. (E–H) Mean islet size (E) and the ratios of insulin-positive area (F), glucagon-positive area (G) and cleaved caspase-3-positive area (H) to the total islet area were calculated (n = 3; 156–203 islets), respectively. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, versus control mice. ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) was used. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the differences between two groups.](/cms/asset/935ef842-dc83-4150-9172-c5a85e66b7ac/idrd_a_1279237_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Effects of Nano-Orz on insulin tolerance and hepatic gene expressions related to ER stress and glucose homeostasis in ob/ob mice. Blood glucose levels and the AUC during ITT treated with regular γ-oryzanol (A) and Nano-Orz (B) for 3 weeks. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8). †† p < 0.01 compared with ob/+ mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with Nano-Vehicle-treated mice mice. (C, D) Expression levels of mRNA for Chop, ERdj4, Xbp1s (C), PGC1α, Pepck and G6Pase (D) in liver (n = 8). The mRNA levels were determined by real-time PCR and normalized by those of 18S rRNA. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus vehicle-treated mice (Veh). ANOVA and repeated-measures ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) were used.
![Figure 4. Effects of Nano-Orz on insulin tolerance and hepatic gene expressions related to ER stress and glucose homeostasis in ob/ob mice. Blood glucose levels and the AUC during ITT treated with regular γ-oryzanol (A) and Nano-Orz (B) for 3 weeks. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 8). †† p < 0.01 compared with ob/+ mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with Nano-Vehicle-treated mice mice. (C, D) Expression levels of mRNA for Chop, ERdj4, Xbp1s (C), PGC1α, Pepck and G6Pase (D) in liver (n = 8). The mRNA levels were determined by real-time PCR and normalized by those of 18S rRNA. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus vehicle-treated mice (Veh). ANOVA and repeated-measures ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) were used.](/cms/asset/52846b89-6fc0-4ebb-ab59-dabe6bb4882f/idrd_a_1279237_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Effects of Nano-Orz on lipid metabolism in ob/ob mice. Metabolism of triglyceride (TG) (A–E) and total cholesterol (F–I) in Nano-Orz-treated ob/ob mice. Plasma (A, F), hepatic accumulation (B, G) and fecal (C, H) levels of TG (A–C) and total cholesterol (F–H). (D) Oil red O staining of liver sections. Scale bar, 200 μm; magnification, ×200. (E) Expression levels of lipogenic genes, ACC1, FAS, SREBP1c and PPARα in liver (n = 8). (I) Expression levels of genes involved in cholesterol synthesis, SREPB2, LDLR, HMGcs and HMGcr in liver (n = 8). The mRNA levels were determined by real-time PCR and normalized by those of 18S rRNA. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus vehicle-treated mice (Veh). ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) was used.
![Figure 5. Effects of Nano-Orz on lipid metabolism in ob/ob mice. Metabolism of triglyceride (TG) (A–E) and total cholesterol (F–I) in Nano-Orz-treated ob/ob mice. Plasma (A, F), hepatic accumulation (B, G) and fecal (C, H) levels of TG (A–C) and total cholesterol (F–H). (D) Oil red O staining of liver sections. Scale bar, 200 μm; magnification, ×200. (E) Expression levels of lipogenic genes, ACC1, FAS, SREBP1c and PPARα in liver (n = 8). (I) Expression levels of genes involved in cholesterol synthesis, SREPB2, LDLR, HMGcs and HMGcr in liver (n = 8). The mRNA levels were determined by real-time PCR and normalized by those of 18S rRNA. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus vehicle-treated mice (Veh). ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) was used.](/cms/asset/e1e24f3d-be34-447f-ba17-d862e3db8780/idrd_a_1279237_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Impact of Nano-Orz on preference for dietary fat and hypothalamic ER stress in ob/ob mice. (A) HFD preference in mice treated with Nano-Orz. Mice were allowed free access to CD and HFD (n = 4; three mice per cage). Mice were treated with Nano-Orz (0.01 and 0.1 μg/g body weight/day) or FITC-encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles (0.1 μg/g body weight/day) for 4 weeks, and mRNA levels were measured in the hypothalamus for Chop, ERdj4, Xbp1s (B), TNFα and MCP-1 (C). Values were normalized to that of 18S rRNA and are expressed as levels relative to that of vehicle-treated mice (n = 8). The mRNA levels were determined using real-time PCR. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with vehicle-treated mice. ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) was used.
![Figure 6. Impact of Nano-Orz on preference for dietary fat and hypothalamic ER stress in ob/ob mice. (A) HFD preference in mice treated with Nano-Orz. Mice were allowed free access to CD and HFD (n = 4; three mice per cage). Mice were treated with Nano-Orz (0.01 and 0.1 μg/g body weight/day) or FITC-encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles (0.1 μg/g body weight/day) for 4 weeks, and mRNA levels were measured in the hypothalamus for Chop, ERdj4, Xbp1s (B), TNFα and MCP-1 (C). Values were normalized to that of 18S rRNA and are expressed as levels relative to that of vehicle-treated mice (n = 8). The mRNA levels were determined using real-time PCR. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared with vehicle-treated mice. ANOVA followed by multiple comparison tests (Bonferroni/Dunn method) was used.](/cms/asset/c1693c9c-5666-4079-93ed-69919b6afd76/idrd_a_1279237_f0006_b.jpg)