5,457
Views
86
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

PEG–lipid–PLGA hybrid nanoparticles loaded with berberine–phospholipid complex to facilitate the oral delivery efficiency

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 825-833 | Received 05 Mar 2017, Accepted 17 Apr 2017, Published online: 16 May 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Particle size and encapsulation efficiency of PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC at different weight ratios of the BBR–SPC complex to PLGA polymer.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC for oral drug delivery.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC for oral drug delivery.

Figure 2. Characterization of PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC. (A) Schematic structure, (B) TEM image, (C) SEM image, (D) particle size distribution and (E) zeta potential of PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC.

Figure 2. Characterization of PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC. (A) Schematic structure, (B) TEM image, (C) SEM image, (D) particle size distribution and (E) zeta potential of PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC.

Table 2. Stability studies of PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC at SGF and SIF.

Figure 3. DSC and XRD of the PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR-SPC. (A) DSC and (B) XRD of BBR, SPC, BBR + SPC, BBR–SPC, PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs, a physical mixture of all ingredients and PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC.

Figure 3. DSC and XRD of the PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR-SPC. (A) DSC and (B) XRD of BBR, SPC, BBR + SPC, BBR–SPC, PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs, a physical mixture of all ingredients and PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC.

Figure 4. In vitro time-dependent drug release profiles of BBR and PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC in (A) SGF and (B) SIF.

Figure 4. In vitro time-dependent drug release profiles of BBR and PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC in (A) SGF and (B) SIF.

Figure 5. CLSM images of different segments of the small intestine. CLSM images showing the absorption of (A) BBR and (B) PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC in different segments of the small intestine. DAPI was used to label the cell nuclei (blue).

Figure 5. CLSM images of different segments of the small intestine. CLSM images showing the absorption of (A) BBR and (B) PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC in different segments of the small intestine. DAPI was used to label the cell nuclei (blue).

Figure 6. The profiles of the plasma BBR level versus time among the rats after oral administration of BBR and PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6).

Figure 6. The profiles of the plasma BBR level versus time among the rats after oral administration of BBR and PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6).

Table 3. Pharmacokinetic parameters of various groups of rats after a single oral dose administration of BBR and the PEG–lipid–PLGA NPs/BBR–SPC.