1,876
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Hierarchical pulmonary target nanoparticles via inhaled administration for anticancer drug delivery

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1191-1203 | Received 06 Jul 2017, Accepted 06 Aug 2017, Published online: 28 Aug 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. (a) Schematic fabrication of intelligent RGDfk–histidine–PLGA-NPs for pulmonary mitochondrial-targeted drug delivery. (b) TEM images of yuanhuacine/MNPs. (c) Acid titration profiles of blank solution, PLGA-NPs, and MNPs solutions.

Figure 1. (a) Schematic fabrication of intelligent RGDfk–histidine–PLGA-NPs for pulmonary mitochondrial-targeted drug delivery. (b) TEM images of yuanhuacine/MNPs. (c) Acid titration profiles of blank solution, PLGA-NPs, and MNPs solutions.

Figure 2. Biodistribution of intravenous or inhaled administration of yuanhuacine/MNPs accumulation in the (a) liver, (b) kidney, (c) spleen, (d) reproductive, and (e) lung at different time points with a yuanhuacine dose of 100 μg/kg (n = 4). *p < .05, **p < .01 versus intravenous group.

Figure 2. Biodistribution of intravenous or inhaled administration of yuanhuacine/MNPs accumulation in the (a) liver, (b) kidney, (c) spleen, (d) reproductive, and (e) lung at different time points with a yuanhuacine dose of 100 μg/kg (n = 4). *p < .05, **p < .01 versus intravenous group.

Table 1. Lung targeting efficiency (Te) of yuanhuancine/MNPs.

Figure 3. Cellular uptake on A549 cells after applying yuanhuacine, yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs, and yuanhuacine/MNPs at (a) different time, (b) different drug concentration, (c) different temperature, and (d) relative uptake efficiency (%) in the presence of various endocytosis inhibitors. *p < .05, **p < .01 versus control.

Figure 3. Cellular uptake on A549 cells after applying yuanhuacine, yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs, and yuanhuacine/MNPs at (a) different time, (b) different drug concentration, (c) different temperature, and (d) relative uptake efficiency (%) in the presence of various endocytosis inhibitors. *p < .05, **p < .01 versus control.

Figure 4. Images of intracellular delivery of C6 labeled PLGA-NPs and MNPs in A549 cells. Merged image of the NPs with the dyes was indicated by arrows.

Figure 4. Images of intracellular delivery of C6 labeled PLGA-NPs and MNPs in A549 cells. Merged image of the NPs with the dyes was indicated by arrows.

Figure 5. (a) Flow cytometric images to detect apoptosis and (b) apoptosis percentage on A549 cells after applying yuanhuacine, yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs, and yuanhuacine/MNPs with yuanhuacine concentration of 10 μM for 24 h. *p < .05, **p < .01 versus yuanhuacine, #p < .05 versus yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs. (c) Cell cycle and (d) cell percentage in G2 phase on A549 cells after applying yuanhuacine, yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs, and yuanhuacine/MNPs with yuanhuacine concentration of 10 μM for 24 h. *p < .05, **p < .01 versus control. (e) Mitochondrial membrane potential measurement and (f) cytochrome c detection on A549 cells after applying yuanhuacine, yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs and yuanhuacine/MNPs at a yuanhuacin concentration of 10 μM for 24 h.

Figure 5. (a) Flow cytometric images to detect apoptosis and (b) apoptosis percentage on A549 cells after applying yuanhuacine, yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs, and yuanhuacine/MNPs with yuanhuacine concentration of 10 μM for 24 h. *p < .05, **p < .01 versus yuanhuacine, #p < .05 versus yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs. (c) Cell cycle and (d) cell percentage in G2 phase on A549 cells after applying yuanhuacine, yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs, and yuanhuacine/MNPs with yuanhuacine concentration of 10 μM for 24 h. *p < .05, **p < .01 versus control. (e) Mitochondrial membrane potential measurement and (f) cytochrome c detection on A549 cells after applying yuanhuacine, yuanhuacine/PLGA-NPs and yuanhuacine/MNPs at a yuanhuacin concentration of 10 μM for 24 h.
Supplemental material

IDRD_Chen_et_al_Supplemental_Content.docx

Download MS Word (1.5 MB)