Figures & data
Figure 1. Design of Pep-1 and CREKA dual-conjugated PEG-PLGA nanocarrier (PC-NP) for glioma targeting delivery based on the strong binding capacity of CREKA to fibrin–fibronectin complexes and IL-13Rα2-mediated endocytosis.
![Figure 1. Design of Pep-1 and CREKA dual-conjugated PEG-PLGA nanocarrier (PC-NP) for glioma targeting delivery based on the strong binding capacity of CREKA to fibrin–fibronectin complexes and IL-13Rα2-mediated endocytosis.](/cms/asset/68aa29d3-6ca6-4c6e-a33b-e44cc3a42158/idrd_a_1378940_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. TEM image (A) and particle size distribution (B) of PC-NP-PTX. PTX release profiles of various nanoparticles in PBS (pH 5.0) (C) and PBS (pH 7.4) (D) with 0.5% (w/v) Tween 80.
![Figure 2. TEM image (A) and particle size distribution (B) of PC-NP-PTX. PTX release profiles of various nanoparticles in PBS (pH 5.0) (C) and PBS (pH 7.4) (D) with 0.5% (w/v) Tween 80.](/cms/asset/b5119451-fb47-4648-b077-8b7fbbc12d9f/idrd_a_1378940_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Cellular uptake assay of nanoparticles. (A) Fluorescent microscopy image showing the cellular uptake of coumarin-6-labeled (10, 20 and 40 ng/mL) NP, Pep-NP, CREKA-NP and PC-NP by U87MG cells after incubation at 37 °C for 1 h. Bar: 100 μm. (B) Uptake of various coumarin-6-labeled (200–1000 ng/mL) nanoparticles by U87MG cells at 37 °C for 1 h as determined by HPLC. (C) Uptake of various coumarin-6-labeled (500 ng/mL) nanoparticles by U87MG cells at 37 °C for 0.5–4.0 h as determined by HPLC. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < .05 vs NP, **p < .01 vs NP, ***p < .001 vs NP.
![Figure 3. Cellular uptake assay of nanoparticles. (A) Fluorescent microscopy image showing the cellular uptake of coumarin-6-labeled (10, 20 and 40 ng/mL) NP, Pep-NP, CREKA-NP and PC-NP by U87MG cells after incubation at 37 °C for 1 h. Bar: 100 μm. (B) Uptake of various coumarin-6-labeled (200–1000 ng/mL) nanoparticles by U87MG cells at 37 °C for 1 h as determined by HPLC. (C) Uptake of various coumarin-6-labeled (500 ng/mL) nanoparticles by U87MG cells at 37 °C for 0.5–4.0 h as determined by HPLC. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < .05 vs NP, **p < .01 vs NP, ***p < .001 vs NP.](/cms/asset/3118e6a3-a6de-4eaf-a3f6-47a1cdd581f1/idrd_a_1378940_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Cytotoxicity studies of Taxol®, NP, Pep-NP, CREKA-NP and PC-NP in U87MG cells after incubation for 48 h (n = 6). ***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05.
![Figure 4. Cytotoxicity studies of Taxol®, NP, Pep-NP, CREKA-NP and PC-NP in U87MG cells after incubation for 48 h (n = 6). ***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05.](/cms/asset/f4b431f4-e207-4316-8a94-a231fbf73fc9/idrd_a_1378940_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. In vitro binding of various nanoparticles to FFP clots. (A) IVIS spectrum imaging and (B) corresponding radiant efficacy of FFP clots or CREKA-pretreated FFP clots after incubation with PBS (control) and DiR-labeled nanoparticles (NP, CREKA-NP, Pep-NP and PC-NP). Values were means ± SD, n = 3. ***p < .001 compared with NP group, ###p < .001 compared with CREKA + PC-NP group.
![Figure 5. In vitro binding of various nanoparticles to FFP clots. (A) IVIS spectrum imaging and (B) corresponding radiant efficacy of FFP clots or CREKA-pretreated FFP clots after incubation with PBS (control) and DiR-labeled nanoparticles (NP, CREKA-NP, Pep-NP and PC-NP). Values were means ± SD, n = 3. ***p < .001 compared with NP group, ###p < .001 compared with CREKA + PC-NP group.](/cms/asset/14fc2a9a-d759-48c8-96c4-0257579a3e4e/idrd_a_1378940_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. In vivo distribution and anti-GBM efficacy of nanoparticles in U87MG glioma-bearing nude mice. (A) In vivo real-time fluorescence imaging of U87MG glioma-bearing nude mice administrated with DiR-labeled NP, CREKA-NP, Pep-NP and PC-NP at two different time points (4 h and 24 h). (B) (C) Ex vivo fluorescence imaging of organs and brains sacrificed 24 h after treatment. (D) In vivo distribution of various coumarin-6-loaded nanoparticles in glioma sections of U87MG glioma-bearing nude mice. Dash lines: border of the glioma. Original magnification: ×20. (E) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for U87MG glioma-bearing mice treated with different PTX formulations at a dose of 10 mg/kg PTX on day 2, 4, 6 and 8 post-implantations.
![Figure 6. In vivo distribution and anti-GBM efficacy of nanoparticles in U87MG glioma-bearing nude mice. (A) In vivo real-time fluorescence imaging of U87MG glioma-bearing nude mice administrated with DiR-labeled NP, CREKA-NP, Pep-NP and PC-NP at two different time points (4 h and 24 h). (B) (C) Ex vivo fluorescence imaging of organs and brains sacrificed 24 h after treatment. (D) In vivo distribution of various coumarin-6-loaded nanoparticles in glioma sections of U87MG glioma-bearing nude mice. Dash lines: border of the glioma. Original magnification: ×20. (E) Kaplan–Meier survival curves for U87MG glioma-bearing mice treated with different PTX formulations at a dose of 10 mg/kg PTX on day 2, 4, 6 and 8 post-implantations.](/cms/asset/7145296c-f587-413e-80ef-3683b0b71261/idrd_a_1378940_f0006_c.jpg)