2,125
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Targeted tumor dual mode CT/MR imaging using multifunctional polyethylenimine-entrapped gold nanoparticles loaded with gadolinium

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 178-186 | Received 13 Nov 2017, Accepted 25 Dec 2017, Published online: 04 Jan 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs.

Figure 2. TEM image (a) and size distribution histogram (b) of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs. Inset of (a) is the high-resolution TEM image of a typical FA-Gd-Au PENP. (c) MTT assay of HeLa cell viability after treatment with the FA-Gd-Au PENPs at different Au concentrations for 24 h. Data are reported as mean ± SD (n = 3). (d) Cellular Au uptake in HeLa cells incubated with the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and nontargeted Gd-Au PENPs with different Au concentrations for 3 h.

Figure 2. TEM image (a) and size distribution histogram (b) of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs. Inset of (a) is the high-resolution TEM image of a typical FA-Gd-Au PENP. (c) MTT assay of HeLa cell viability after treatment with the FA-Gd-Au PENPs at different Au concentrations for 24 h. Data are reported as mean ± SD (n = 3). (d) Cellular Au uptake in HeLa cells incubated with the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and nontargeted Gd-Au PENPs with different Au concentrations for 3 h.

Figure 3. Confocal microscopic images of HeLa cells treated with the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and nontargeted Gd-Au PENPs ([Au] = 100 μM) for 12 h. The white frame refers to the cytophagic particles.

Figure 3. Confocal microscopic images of HeLa cells treated with the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and nontargeted Gd-Au PENPs ([Au] = 100 μM) for 12 h. The white frame refers to the cytophagic particles.

Figure 4. (a) CT phantom images and (c) X-ray attenuation intensity of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and Omnipaque as a function of the molar concentration of the radiodense element (Au or iodine). (b) and (d) show the T1-weighted MR phantom images and the linear fitting of the inverse T1 of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs as a function of Gd concentration.

Figure 4. (a) CT phantom images and (c) X-ray attenuation intensity of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and Omnipaque as a function of the molar concentration of the radiodense element (Au or iodine). (b) and (d) show the T1-weighted MR phantom images and the linear fitting of the inverse T1 of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs as a function of Gd concentration.

Figure 5. In vivo CT images (including renderings) (a) and CT values (b) of tumors at different time points post-injection of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and nontargeted Gd-Au PENPs ([Au] = 0.1 M, 150 μL in PBS for each mouse). The circle in each panel refers to the tumors site.

Figure 5. In vivo CT images (including renderings) (a) and CT values (b) of tumors at different time points post-injection of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and nontargeted Gd-Au PENPs ([Au] = 0.1 M, 150 μL in PBS for each mouse). The circle in each panel refers to the tumors site.

Figure 6. In vivo T1-weighted MR images (including pseudo-color images) (a) and tumor signal enhancement percentage (b) of nude mice before and at different time points post-injection of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and nontargeted Gd-Au PENPs ([Gd] = 0.01 M, 150 μL in PBS for each mouse). The circle in each panel refers to the tumor site.

Figure 6. In vivo T1-weighted MR images (including pseudo-color images) (a) and tumor signal enhancement percentage (b) of nude mice before and at different time points post-injection of the FA-Gd-Au PENPs and nontargeted Gd-Au PENPs ([Gd] = 0.01 M, 150 μL in PBS for each mouse). The circle in each panel refers to the tumor site.
Supplemental material

IDRD_Shi_et_al_Supplemental_Content.doc

Download MS Word (1.5 MB)