1,849
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Nasal delivery of H5N1 avian influenza vaccine formulated with GenJet™ or in vivo-jetPEI® induces enhanced serological, cellular and protective immune responses

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 773-779 | Received 12 Dec 2017, Accepted 07 Mar 2018, Published online: 15 Mar 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. GenJet™ and in vivo-jetPEI enhances the H5N1 vaccine-induced systemic antibody responses and memory B-cell responses. Balb/c mice (5 mice/group) were intranasally administered with 3 µg of A/IN/05 vaccine with or without GenJet™ (10 µl/each mouse as described in previous study (Kulkarni et al., Citation2014)) or in vivo-jetPEI® (0.6 μl/mouse according to manufacturer’s protocol). One month later, mice were boosted with the same vaccine formulations. The control mouse group received GenJet™, in vivo-jetPEI® or PBS at both time points. (A) Three weeks after booster immunization, sera were collected and IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies against A/IN/05 were assessed by ELISA. (B) One week after booster immunization, the spleen were harvested and the frequency of A/IN/05-specific IgG+ ASCs in the spleen were measured by ELISPOT assay. The number of A/IN/05-specific IgG+ ASCs were normalized against the number of total IgG+ secreting ASCs and presented as % Ag-specific IgG+ B cells. The data are representative of two independent experiments (3–5 mice each group) and error bars represent SEM. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-analysis was used to analyze differences among different groups. p < .05, p < .01 and p < .001 as compared to the H5N1 vaccine alone group.

Figure 1. GenJet™ and in vivo-jetPEI enhances the H5N1 vaccine-induced systemic antibody responses and memory B-cell responses. Balb/c mice (5 mice/group) were intranasally administered with 3 µg of A/IN/05 vaccine with or without GenJet™ (10 µl/each mouse as described in previous study (Kulkarni et al., Citation2014)) or in vivo-jetPEI® (0.6 μl/mouse according to manufacturer’s protocol). One month later, mice were boosted with the same vaccine formulations. The control mouse group received GenJet™, in vivo-jetPEI® or PBS at both time points. (A) Three weeks after booster immunization, sera were collected and IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies against A/IN/05 were assessed by ELISA. (B) One week after booster immunization, the spleen were harvested and the frequency of A/IN/05-specific IgG+ ASCs in the spleen were measured by ELISPOT assay. The number of A/IN/05-specific IgG+ ASCs were normalized against the number of total IgG+ secreting ASCs and presented as % Ag-specific IgG+ B cells. The data are representative of two independent experiments (3–5 mice each group) and error bars represent SEM. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-analysis was used to analyze differences among different groups. p < .05, p < .01 and p < .001 as compared to the H5N1 vaccine alone group.

Figure 2. GenJet™ and in vivo-jetPEI® enhanced the H5N1-specific T-cell responses. Balb/c mice (3–5 mice/group) were intranasally administered with A/IN/05 vaccine with or without GenJet™ or in vivo-jetPEI® using prime-boost regimen as described in . (A) One week after booster immunization, the lung tissues were harvested and single cell suspensions were prepared. About 106 cells from the lung were stimulated in vitro with HA peptide for 6 h to examine the antigen-specific CD8 T-cell response; or with RG A/IN/05 virus at an MOI of 1 for 16 h to examine the antigen-specific CD4 T-cell response. GolgiPlug™ was added during the last 5 h of incubation. Cells were surface stained with anti-CD44, anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 antibody (BD Bioscience), followed by intracellular staining with anti-IFNγ antibody (BD Bioscience). The frequency of IFN-γ producing T cells in total activated T cells was presented. (B) One-week post-booster immunization, the draining lymph nodes, lungs and spleen tissues were harvested and the frequency of HA518-specific CD8 T cells in total activated CD8 T cells was stained using H-2Kd/IYSTVASSL tetramer. (C) Three weeks after booster immunization, sera were collected and IgG2a, IgG2b IgG3 and IgG1 antibodies against A/IN/05 were assessed by ELISA. The data are representative of two independent experiments (3–5 mice each group) and error bars represent SEM. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-analysis was used to analyze differences among treatments. p < .05, p < .01 and p < .001 as compared to the H5N1 vaccine alone group.

Figure 2. GenJet™ and in vivo-jetPEI® enhanced the H5N1-specific T-cell responses. Balb/c mice (3–5 mice/group) were intranasally administered with A/IN/05 vaccine with or without GenJet™ or in vivo-jetPEI® using prime-boost regimen as described in Figure 1. (A) One week after booster immunization, the lung tissues were harvested and single cell suspensions were prepared. About 106 cells from the lung were stimulated in vitro with HA peptide for 6 h to examine the antigen-specific CD8 T-cell response; or with RG A/IN/05 virus at an MOI of 1 for 16 h to examine the antigen-specific CD4 T-cell response. GolgiPlug™ was added during the last 5 h of incubation. Cells were surface stained with anti-CD44, anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 antibody (BD Bioscience), followed by intracellular staining with anti-IFNγ antibody (BD Bioscience). The frequency of IFN-γ producing T cells in total activated T cells was presented. (B) One-week post-booster immunization, the draining lymph nodes, lungs and spleen tissues were harvested and the frequency of HA518-specific CD8 T cells in total activated CD8 T cells was stained using H-2Kd/IYSTVASSL tetramer. (C) Three weeks after booster immunization, sera were collected and IgG2a, IgG2b IgG3 and IgG1 antibodies against A/IN/05 were assessed by ELISA. The data are representative of two independent experiments (3–5 mice each group) and error bars represent SEM. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-analysis was used to analyze differences among treatments. p < .05, p < .01 and p < .001 as compared to the H5N1 vaccine alone group.

Figure 3. GenJet™ and in vivo-jetPEI enhanced the protective immunity. Balb/c mice (5 mice/group) were intranasally administered with A/IN/05 vaccine with or without GenJet™ or in vivo-jetPEI® using the prime-boost regimen as described in . (A) Sera were collected at the third week following primary immunization (W3) and booster immunization (W7). HI titers were measured against RG A/IN/05 virus. (b,c) Four weeks following booster immunization, mice were challenged with 5 × LD50 of RG A/IN/05 virus. Mice were weighed every day to monitor body weight changes (B) and mortality (C). Mice that lost more than 25% body weight were euthanized and scored as a fatality. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-analysis was used to compare the percentage of body weight changes and the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test was used to compare percent survival among groups of mice. n = 5 mice for each group from two independent experiments and the error bars represent SEM. p < .05, p < .01 and p < .001 as compared to the H5N1 vaccine alone group.

Figure 3. GenJet™ and in vivo-jetPEI enhanced the protective immunity. Balb/c mice (5 mice/group) were intranasally administered with A/IN/05 vaccine with or without GenJet™ or in vivo-jetPEI® using the prime-boost regimen as described in Figure 1. (A) Sera were collected at the third week following primary immunization (W3) and booster immunization (W7). HI titers were measured against RG A/IN/05 virus. (b,c) Four weeks following booster immunization, mice were challenged with 5 × LD50 of RG A/IN/05 virus. Mice were weighed every day to monitor body weight changes (B) and mortality (C). Mice that lost more than 25% body weight were euthanized and scored as a fatality. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-analysis was used to compare the percentage of body weight changes and the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test was used to compare percent survival among groups of mice. n = 5 mice for each group from two independent experiments and the error bars represent SEM. p < .05, p < .01 and p < .001 as compared to the H5N1 vaccine alone group.
Supplemental material

IDRD_Cao_et_al_Supplemental_Content.pdf

Download PDF (186.7 KB)