Figures & data
Figure 1 The morphological difference of un-induced MSCs (A) and induced MSCs (B) under phase–contrast microscopy (100×).
![Figure 1 The morphological difference of un-induced MSCs (A) and induced MSCs (B) under phase–contrast microscopy (100×).](/cms/asset/e6548466-e915-4812-b4f3-a9b1e6e23538/ianb19_a_143002_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2 Immunofluorescence localization of S-100 (A) and GFAP (B) in differentiated MSCs, and the corresponding nuclei counterstained with DAPI (C and D). The red region in cell body was the positive reaction region (100×).
![Figure 2 Immunofluorescence localization of S-100 (A) and GFAP (B) in differentiated MSCs, and the corresponding nuclei counterstained with DAPI (C and D). The red region in cell body was the positive reaction region (100×).](/cms/asset/4825f9bc-31a2-4fb1-9cac-99945121beca/ianb19_a_143002_f0002_b.gif)
Table 1. Absorption value of three groups (x ± s)