262
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension version 2 (GV2): Psychometric properties

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 149-157 | Published online: 01 Oct 2019
 

Abstract

Context: GRASSP Version 1 (GV1) was developed in 2010, is an upper extremity measure specifically designed to assess recovery after traumatic tetraplegia. A second version was developed to reduce length of the test and refine instructions/standardization. The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to calculate psychometric properties of GRASSP Version 2 (GV2).

Design/Setting: A post-hoc analysis of datasets for the GRASSP cross-sectional (n = 72 chronic,) and longitudinal (n = 127 acute) studies was conducted. Reliability, validity and MDD were calculated from the chronic sample and responsiveness was re-calculated from the longitudinal sample. Both studies were observational.

Participants: A chronic sample (n = 72) and acute longitudinal sample (n = 127) of individuals with traumatic tetraplegia (AIS A to D, NLI C2 to C8) were studied.

Outcome Measures: GV1, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM), International Standards of Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) were administered in both studies at all centers and the Capabilities of the Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE-Q) was administered in North American sites only. GRASSP-Palmar Sensation, GRASSP-Prehension Performance subtest items included in GV2 were re-analyzed for reliability; validity, MDD and responsiveness.

Results: Inter-rater and test-retest reliability for all subtests ranged between 0.849–0.971 and 0.950–0.971 respectively. Concurrent validity between domains of GV2 were positively and moderately (0.530–0.830, P < 0.0001) correlated to SCIM, SCIM self-care subscore (SS) and CUE-Q. MDD values were 4 and 3 points for sensation and prehension performance (single side). Responsiveness values were .84-.88 for GR-Sens and .93–1.22 for GR-PP respectively.

Conclusions: GV2 retains excellent psychometric properties as does GV1.

Additional information

Funding

This work has been supported by the Craig Neilsen Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Physiotherapy Foundation of Canada, Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation, Rick Hansen Institute and Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation in North America. European colleagues were supported by IRP and the EMSCI. The author(s) disclose receipt of financial support for the Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland, and the Clinical Research Priority Program NeuroRehab of the University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 184.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.