Lack of Complete Exposure Pathways for Metals in Natural and FGD Gypsum

ABSTRACT

Use of wallboard made from synthetic gypsum generated via flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) by coal-fired power plants (FGD gypsum) raised questions concerning the potential for exposure to residual trace metals. Because gypsum is widely used (e.g., in wallboard), any issue with metals could have far-reaching implications. A conceptual site model evaluated potential human health exposure pathways for metals in gypsum, through consideration of data for 21 metals including samples of natural (mined) gypsum, and of FGD gypsum. Because there are no screening values for gypsum, comparisons were made to background soil concentrations and to risk-based concentrations for metals in soil termed preliminary remedial action goals (PRGs), which assume more frequent and prolonged contact with particulate soil than would be likely for gypsum, and thus provide a health protective means for evaluation of exposure. Additional screenings evaluated occupational exposure and agricultural use of gypsum. Maximum metal concentrations in natural and FGD gypsum samples were either consistent with background concentrations or much lower than PRGs for residential or agricultural soil, or workplace air, and thus exposure pathways for these media were considered incomplete. Separate analyses of mercury volatilization were conducted, and this pathway was also found to be incomplete.

Key Words:

• risk assessment
• metals
• gypsum
• human health
• mercury
• product stewardship

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Georgia-Pacific Company for their funding and assistance in this effort. The authors also gratefully acknowledge our editor Patti Warden for her careful and thorough review of this work and Jason Pope for his excellent and cheerful support in preparing the figures provided here.