572
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PARTNERS, POPULATIONS, AND PROGRESS

Cancer Information Disparities Between U.S.- and Foreign-Born Populations

Pages 5-21 | Published online: 10 Dec 2010
 

Abstract

Immigrant health is an important component of American public health. But relatively little is known about immigrants' cancer information use. Using the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) data, this study examined potential disparities between foreign-born (n = 563) and U.S.-born (n = 4,830) populations in their access to and experience with cancer information. Logistic regressions showed that foreign-born Hispanics were less likely than the U.S.-born to have ever sought cancer information (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = .51). Foreign-born individuals overall were also less likely to have had somebody else look for cancer information for them (OR = .66). Compared with the U.S.-born, foreign-born individuals in general faced greater obstacles during the process of cancer information seeking (ORs = 1.98–2.27). They were also less trusting of some important sources of health information (ORs = .50–.64), a pattern that was particularly pronounced among Hispanics (ORs = .20–.43). Implications of these disparities were explored through multiple linear regressions that revealed negative associations between cancer information use and undesirable cancer beliefs.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Xiaomei Cai for her assistance in early stages of this research.

Notes

Note. Bold ORs are significant. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001. ORs are adjusted for gender, age, race (not included in White- and Hispanic-only analyses), education, marital status, health status, cancer diagnosis, health coverage, and employment.

a Cases missing information on birthplace were excluded from analyses (n = 193).

b These analyses were conducted with respondents who reported having ever looked for cancer information by themselves; n = 2,925 for the overall analysis, n = 2,322 for White-only analysis, n = 151 for Hispanic-only analysis.

c This analysis was conducted with respondents who reported ever using the Internet; n = 3,089 for the overall analysis, n = 2,471 for White-only analysis, n = 167 for Hispanic-only analysis.

Note. b = unstandardized coefficient. Bold coefficients are significant. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

a Cases missing information on birthplace were excluded from analyses (n = 193).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 215.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.