Figures & data
Table 1. Absolute and relative frequencies according to socio-economic and occupational strata of the woman at onset of risk for the first child
Figure 1. Total fertility rate (TFR) 1900–1963 in the POPLINK-sample from Västerbotten and in Sweden 1900–70.
![Figure 1. Total fertility rate (TFR) 1900–1963 in the POPLINK-sample from Västerbotten and in Sweden 1900–70.](/cms/asset/2c65f872-41e0-4659-99e0-ff46811f19ca/rhof_a_1556721_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Relative distribution of socio-economic strata by risk cohorts (year reaching age 20) 1900–59 for Swedish women in Västerbotten county.
![Figure 2. Relative distribution of socio-economic strata by risk cohorts (year reaching age 20) 1900–59 for Swedish women in Västerbotten county.](/cms/asset/96533f54-378d-44e6-ad18-aeea3762645d/rhof_a_1556721_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion not having experienced first, second and third birth as function of the woman’s age by socio-economic strata and at-risk cohort (year reaching age 20) 1900–59.
![Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion not having experienced first, second and third birth as function of the woman’s age by socio-economic strata and at-risk cohort (year reaching age 20) 1900–59.](/cms/asset/246fad7d-c717-4454-882d-3cce3dd3c5fb/rhof_a_1556721_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion not having experienced first birth as a function of the woman’s age in different female middle-class occupations compared to non-employed women by risk cohorts (year reaching age 20) 1900–59.
![Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion not having experienced first birth as a function of the woman’s age in different female middle-class occupations compared to non-employed women by risk cohorts (year reaching age 20) 1900–59.](/cms/asset/06c0e1cb-edd9-4a78-9e91-14ed9fb74d88/rhof_a_1556721_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion not having experienced second birth as a function of the woman’s age in different female middle-class occupations compared to non-employed women by risk cohorts (year reaching age 20) 1900–59.
![Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion not having experienced second birth as a function of the woman’s age in different female middle-class occupations compared to non-employed women by risk cohorts (year reaching age 20) 1900–59.](/cms/asset/f0f89da7-a72d-48ce-aeb0-7b4758a8617f/rhof_a_1556721_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion not having experienced a third birth as a function of the woman’s age in different female middle-class occupations compared to non-employed women by risk cohorts (year reaching age 20) 1900–59.
![Figure 6. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the proportion not having experienced a third birth as a function of the woman’s age in different female middle-class occupations compared to non-employed women by risk cohorts (year reaching age 20) 1900–59.](/cms/asset/3397e10c-db3a-4405-910e-83094c43d86e/rhof_a_1556721_f0006_oc.jpg)