https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6740-186X
![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Background
There is a growing emphasis on reducing alcohol fueled violence. We do not know whether legislation to close nighttime entertainment districts (NEDs) earlier leads to decreased intoxication and fear of violence within the NED.
Methods
We collected data before restrictive alcohol legislation (n = 2,670 participants) and again after legislation was introduced (n = 1,926 participants). Patrons were systematically assessed with surveys and breathalyzers as they exited Brisbane NEDs.
Results
Consistent with a 2-hour reduction in closing times, people left the NED substantially earlier. The exit intoxication levels of people did not change between pre- and post-legislation. After the legislation was introduced perceived risk of violence increased.
Conclusions
Perceived alcohol scarcity leads to increased preloading. With only restrictive legislation on alcohol sales, people do not drink to lower levels of inebriation.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The author alone is responsible for the content and writing of the article.
Funding & support declaration
$38,900, $39,800 & $28,000 National Drug Strategy Law Enforcement Funding Committee (SmartStart Project, Last Drinks Project & What’s On-Board Project). Alcolizer Technology provided consumables for testing and calibrated the breathalyzers.
License to publish
Exclusive license to publish this article is given.
Transparency declaration
The author affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained.
Data sharing
All raw data is provided.