Learning with and from each other: promoting international and interprofessional collaborations in physiotherapy education research – a literature review

Figures & data

Table 1 Frequency data of 113 papers review

Type of paper	Number of types	Number of authors					Number of non-PT authors				Number of countries		Number of institutions
		1	2–3	4–5	6–7	8 +	1	2–3	4–5	6+	1	2+	1	2–3	4–5	6+
Research report	52	2	23	18	8	1	10	4	0	0	52	0	25	18	7	2
Method/model presentation	24	4	7	9	2	2	3	3	0	1	24	1	18	5	0	1
Position statement	20	2	6	7	4	1	3	2	0	0	20	0	6	9	3	2
Case report	16	2	9	4	0	1	3	0	0	0	16	0	10	6	0	0
Literature review	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0
Total	113	10	45	39	14	5	20	9	0	1	113	1	59	39	10	5

Note: The numbers underlined are the highest frequency count for each unit.

Table 2 Countries, institutions and professions involved in the U21 SoMe consortium in Model 2

Australia	The University of Melbourne	Physiotherapy
Canada	University of British Columbia	Medicine
China	Fudan University	Public Health
Hong Kong	University of Hong Kong	Nursing
Tecnologica deMonterrey	Mexico	Medicine
United Kingdom (England)	Birmingham	Dentistry
United Kingdom (England)	Nottingham	Pharmacy
United Kingdom (Ireland)	University College Dublin	Medicine

Note: The table was set up alphabetically by country.