![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Understanding tolerance for wildlife requires accounting for the multiple cognitive antecedents of this concept and its contextual factors. We examined whether direct experience was associated with four antecedent dimensions of tolerance for black bears (antipathy, connection, lethal control [damage], lethal control [danger to self, pets, and economics]), both directly and indirectly via risk perception, self-assessed knowledge, and factual knowledge. We collected data using intercept surveys at trailheads in western Oregon, United States (n = 210). Risk perception was most strongly related to antipathy (cost-related beliefs) and connection (benefit-related beliefs) toward black bears. Self-assessed knowledge was most strongly associated with an individual’s assessment that bears are a nuisance (lethal control [damage] and a safety concern [danger to self, pets, and economics]). Direct experience was related to all four antecedents, whereas factual knowledge was not related to any dimension. Identifying drivers of tolerance can inform actionable recommendations that promote tolerance for wildlife.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge all respondents who completed the questionnaire. Thank you to Dr. Adam Haley for his feedback during the writing of this paper, and Dr. Jimmy Taylor for his knowledge on the ecology of black bears in Oregon. We appreciate the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife for sharing their data on black bear mortality in the state. All survey materials and procedures were approved by the Oregon State University Institutional Review Board (protocol #8666).
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).