2,500
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Development and evaluation of an online integrative histology module: simple design, low-cost, and improves pathology self-efficacy

, , , & ORCID Icon
Article: 2011692 | Received 21 Aug 2020, Accepted 24 Nov 2021, Published online: 14 Dec 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Module Screenshots. (A) Sample screenshot from the bronchus review video. In this frame, the normal thickness for the submucosal glands was reviewed and the names of two conditions were provided that involve changes to the thickness. (B) Sample screen shot from a drag and drop review activity. The user was instructed to move eight specimen images into the corresponding boxes. (C) Answers to drag and drop review activity shown in (B). Histology images were obtained from the Virtual Microscopy Database under an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Creative Commons License (CC). Image (A) was edited to add arrows and percent

Figure 1. Module Screenshots. (A) Sample screenshot from the bronchus review video. In this frame, the normal thickness for the submucosal glands was reviewed and the names of two conditions were provided that involve changes to the thickness. (B) Sample screen shot from a drag and drop review activity. The user was instructed to move eight specimen images into the corresponding boxes. (C) Answers to drag and drop review activity shown in (B). Histology images were obtained from the Virtual Microscopy Database under an Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Creative Commons License (CC). Image (A) was edited to add arrows and percent

Figure 2. Study Timeline

Study data were collected at two time points (phases). The data collected in each phase is listed in gray in the last line of each box. *Day ‘T’ represents the day during which the pathology laboratory session occurred.
Figure 2. Study Timeline

Table 1. Pre-laboratory self-efficacy scores

Figure 3. Pathology Self-Efficacy versus General Self-Efficacy

There is a significant positive correlation between pathology self-efficacy and general self-efficacy among participants (r(93) = 0.64, p < 0.001, Spearman rank correlation test).
Figure 3. Pathology Self-Efficacy versus General Self-Efficacy