Figures & data
Figure 1. Flow of participants among the groups receiving multimodal and traditional teaching approaches. (OSCE: objective structured clinical examination, PE: physical examination).
![Figure 1. Flow of participants among the groups receiving multimodal and traditional teaching approaches. (OSCE: objective structured clinical examination, PE: physical examination).](/cms/asset/67ac694e-b642-43a6-b2d1-f9d97d754263/zmeo_a_2114134_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. The structured multimodal approach for teaching musculoskeletal physical examination skills. (PE: physical examination, SP: simulated patient).
![Figure 2. The structured multimodal approach for teaching musculoskeletal physical examination skills. (PE: physical examination, SP: simulated patient).](/cms/asset/ddb596d4-3dcf-4dd5-8892-10fef460cccd/zmeo_a_2114134_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Comparison of time division among the two teaching methods-based groups.
Table 2. Comparison of OSCE results between the two study groups.
Figure 3. (a) Proportion of passing students in the multimodal and traditional teaching groups at the institutional cutoff score of 60% and modified borderline grouping-based cutoff score of 70% for knee and shoulder OSCEs, combined and separately. (b) Global-ratings-based assessment of students among the multimodal and traditional bedside teaching approaches.
![Figure 3. (a) Proportion of passing students in the multimodal and traditional teaching groups at the institutional cutoff score of 60% and modified borderline grouping-based cutoff score of 70% for knee and shoulder OSCEs, combined and separately. (b) Global-ratings-based assessment of students among the multimodal and traditional bedside teaching approaches.](/cms/asset/7d976ff4-421a-4284-8ff2-f108bf741c92/zmeo_a_2114134_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 3. Significance of proportion-based differences between structured multimodal and traditional bedside teaching groups.