Figures & data
Figure 1. The scoping review consort diagram describes articles’ assortment for this review.
![Figure 1. The scoping review consort diagram describes articles’ assortment for this review.](/cms/asset/7e1b03ad-dcdc-4d26-97fa-a7f83d167d2e/zmeo_a_2165892_f0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Study eligibility criteria.
Table 2. List of original medical professionalism articles included as the selected studies for final evaluation with the retrieved information.
Figure 2. Graphic representation of themes and subthemes yielded as a result of text interpretations.
![Figure 2. Graphic representation of themes and subthemes yielded as a result of text interpretations.](/cms/asset/a9edf4d3-f8eb-437f-a99d-29441b80cf24/zmeo_a_2165892_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Illustrative depiction of the interrelationship model of mental well-being and medical professionalism attributes.
![Figure 3. Illustrative depiction of the interrelationship model of mental well-being and medical professionalism attributes.](/cms/asset/223fd0a1-a0bf-4d5b-b13b-8a6f009d9ebf/zmeo_a_2165892_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 3. The most utilised data collection tools within the included studies.