Figures & data
Figure 1. Uummannaq Fjord and the six communities examined in this study. Uummannaq (population 1255) is the largest community and serves as a regional hub. Background image is a Sentinel-2 NIR image from 19 March 2018. Inset shows the location of Uummannaq Fjord in western Greenland with the location of Sentinel-2 satellite image tiles marked with a red square.
![Figure 1. Uummannaq Fjord and the six communities examined in this study. Uummannaq (population 1255) is the largest community and serves as a regional hub. Background image is a Sentinel-2 NIR image from 19 March 2018. Inset shows the location of Uummannaq Fjord in western Greenland with the location of Sentinel-2 satellite image tiles marked with a red square.](/cms/asset/bddd00cd-8492-4b34-9161-909d5d475112/tpog_a_1938271_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Snowmobiles and dogsleds are common modes of transportation on shorefast ice in Uummannaq Fjord. Here from April 2019. Credit: S.Cooley.
![Figure 2. Snowmobiles and dogsleds are common modes of transportation on shorefast ice in Uummannaq Fjord. Here from April 2019. Credit: S.Cooley.](/cms/asset/ae6f3918-990d-4ea5-9c5f-6ecd753140f6/tpog_a_1938271_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Sentinel-2 image of Uummannaq Fjord on 1 March 2017, displayed as (a) raw NIR band image; (b) classified surface types present in the fjord; (c) modeled cost-distance map illustrating how different surface types and distances influence travel cost between Uummannaq and surrounding communities; (d) optimal least-cost routes generated by the transportation model, showing cheapest (i.e. fastest) routes between Uummannaq and neighboring communities on 1 March 2017.
![Figure 3. Sentinel-2 image of Uummannaq Fjord on 1 March 2017, displayed as (a) raw NIR band image; (b) classified surface types present in the fjord; (c) modeled cost-distance map illustrating how different surface types and distances influence travel cost between Uummannaq and surrounding communities; (d) optimal least-cost routes generated by the transportation model, showing cheapest (i.e. fastest) routes between Uummannaq and neighboring communities on 1 March 2017.](/cms/asset/fbe961fc-563e-4531-8278-ecbf6b5be510/tpog_a_1938271_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Box plots summarizing averaged optimal March travel routes for Period 1 (P1, 1988–1990), Period 2 (P2, 2000–2002), Period 3 (P3, 2014–2016), and Period 4 (P4, 2017–2019) for travel between Uummannaq and each of the other communities. (a) travel distance and (b) travel duration. Niaqornat lacks data in Period 3 due to lack of sufficient cloud free satellite imagery, and some scenes not covering this part of the fjord.
![Figure 4. Box plots summarizing averaged optimal March travel routes for Period 1 (P1, 1988–1990), Period 2 (P2, 2000–2002), Period 3 (P3, 2014–2016), and Period 4 (P4, 2017–2019) for travel between Uummannaq and each of the other communities. (a) travel distance and (b) travel duration. Niaqornat lacks data in Period 3 due to lack of sufficient cloud free satellite imagery, and some scenes not covering this part of the fjord.](/cms/asset/fa543bf1-5a87-4b7b-8892-b032f45be2bf/tpog_a_1938271_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Same as , except for the month of April. (a) April travel distance (b) April travel duration.
![Figure 5. Same as Figure 4, except for the month of April. (a) April travel distance (b) April travel duration.](/cms/asset/5356d29b-ee39-46a1-b3f0-3fe253620c11/tpog_a_1938271_f0005_oc.jpg)