ABSTRACT
The purpose of the present study was to examine the factorial and convergent validity of the German translation of the Exercise Identity Scale (EIS; Anderson & Cychosz, 1994). We introduce a bifactor model as a possible alternative to the previously discussed one- and two-factor models. Using an online study with 530 participants, our results suggest that the EIS should be considered a unidimensional measure. For this one-factor model, temporal invariance (time interval: 2 weeks) and invariance between men and women could be established. Relations to similar constructs were in the expected directions. We provide a psychometrically sound German version of the EIS, which demonstrated factorial and convergent validity in this study. The use of the scale in German samples is likely to advance research on exercise adoption and maintenance by integrating the exercise identity construct.
Acknowledgments
We thank Johanna Kunkel for her help with collecting the data and the reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Notes
1 Although 30 h per week might seem remarkable at first, the sample was quite diverse in terms of level of exercise and sports engagement. The maximum value (30) was given by a triathlete on the national level, which seems plausible. We therefore decided to retain the data of this participant. The second highest value was 20 h per week.