389
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reponses to Terrorism, War, and Torture

Coping Action Patterns in Trauma and Other Autobiographic Narratives in Holocaust survivors: A Mixed–Methods Study

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1307-1326 | Received 11 Feb 2020, Accepted 27 Oct 2020, Published online: 27 Dec 2020
 

ABSTRACT

In a world where genocides and wars are constant reality, understanding the long-term psychological impact of massive trauma on survivors, as well as identifying ways to promote resilience among them are crucial. Research has repeatedly demonstrated Holocaust survivors’ remarkable capacity to live with horrible memories and still function well; however, the exact nature of defensive and coping processes that allowed this have remained mostly unclear. The present study aims to address this question by identifying Coping Action Patterns in survivors’ Holocaust (HN) versus other, pre- and post-Holocaust (ON) narratives. We analyzed 169 thematic units in 20 in-depth interviews with Holocaust survivors using a sequential explanatory mixed-method approach. We found that the proportion of adaptive coping patterns was higher in HN compared to ON, and that the coping category Relatedness, as well as specific individual coping strategies: Self-Reliance, Escape, and Information Seeking occurred more frequently in HN compared to ON, although none of these differences reached statistical significance. A modified interpretative phenomenological approach was used to identify common themes within each coping strategy. The results implicate that maintaining a dual representation of trauma versus regular, non-traumatic autobiographic memories may play a crucial role in the resilience of massive trauma survivors.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Centropa Hungary Jewish Family History Research Centre for conducting the interviews with Holocaust survivors and making them accessible for researchers and the broader public.

Disclosure of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts to report.

Ethical Standards and Informed Consent

The present study used publicly available data and no identifiable information was included in the study.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the J. & O. Winter Fund Research Grant, The City University of New York.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 151.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.