1,334
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

Sensitivity and linearity analysis of ozone in East Asia: The effects of domestic emission and intercontinental transport

, , , &
Pages 1102-1114 | Published online: 21 Aug 2012

Figures & data

Table 1. Model configurations for MM5 and CMAQ

Figure 1. Model domain for the application of CMAQ in East Asia.

Figure 1. Model domain for the application of CMAQ in East Asia.

Table 2. Model evaluation for MM5

Figure 2. CMAQ model simulations evaluate against surface observations at Taipei for O3 (first row) and NOx (second row) in January (left column) and July (right column), 2001.

Figure 2. CMAQ model simulations evaluate against surface observations at Taipei for O3 (first row) and NOx (second row) in January (left column) and July (right column), 2001.

Figure 3. (a) Monthly mean wind speed, wind directions, and temperature in January and (b) July 2001. (c) Monthly mean hourly O3 spatial distribution in January and (d) July 2001.

Figure 3. (a) Monthly mean wind speed, wind directions, and temperature in January and (b) July 2001. (c) Monthly mean hourly O3 spatial distribution in January and (d) July 2001.

Figure 4. Spatial distribution of monthly average O3 responses to local NOx emission reduction at rate of (a) 20%, (b) 50%, and (c) 100% in January, and (g) 20%, (h) 50%, and (i) 100% in July 2001; and the O3 responses to VOC emission reduction at rate of (d) 20%, (e) 50%, and (f) 100% in January, and (j) 20%, (k) 50%, and (l) 100% in July 2001.

Figure 4. Spatial distribution of monthly average O3 responses to local NOx emission reduction at rate of (a) 20%, (b) 50%, and (c) 100% in January, and (g) 20%, (h) 50%, and (i) 100% in July 2001; and the O3 responses to VOC emission reduction at rate of (d) 20%, (e) 50%, and (f) 100% in January, and (j) 20%, (k) 50%, and (l) 100% in July 2001.

Figure 5. O3 response (sensitivity cases: base) for EA and seven urban areas, resulted from local emission reduction for (a) NOx and (b) VOC in January, and for (c) NOx and (d) VOC in July 2001.

Figure 5. O3 response (sensitivity cases: base) for EA and seven urban areas, resulted from local emission reduction for (a) NOx and (b) VOC in January, and for (c) NOx and (d) VOC in July 2001.

Figure 6. Monthly average O3 responses over EA as receptor region from 20% reduction of anthropogenic NOx emissions of (a) EU, (c) SA, and (e) NA in January, and (b) EU, (d) SA, and (f) NA in July 2001.

Figure 6. Monthly average O3 responses over EA as receptor region from 20% reduction of anthropogenic NOx emissions of (a) EU, (c) SA, and (e) NA in January, and (b) EU, (d) SA, and (f) NA in July 2001.

Figure 7. Monthly average and maximum daily O3 responses under intercontinental transport scenario from (a) EU, (b) SA, and (c) NA, and (d) O3 perturbation under local 20% NOx emission reduction over EA.

Figure 7. Monthly average and maximum daily O3 responses under intercontinental transport scenario from (a) EU, (b) SA, and (c) NA, and (d) O3 perturbation under local 20% NOx emission reduction over EA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.