1,241
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

Emissions monitoring at a deep-pit swine finishing facility: Research methods and system performance

, , , &
Pages 1264-1276 | Published online: 24 Oct 2012

Figures & data

Figure 1. Layout of the two-barn finishing farm. Emission monitoring was conducted in rooms 5 to 8 in barn 2.

Figure 1. Layout of the two-barn finishing farm. Emission monitoring was conducted in rooms 5 to 8 in barn 2.

Figure 2. Floor plan of barn 2 (rooms 5 to 8) showing general locations for sampling and measurement. Arrows in front of the heaters indicate hot air exhaust directions.

Figure 2. Floor plan of barn 2 (rooms 5 to 8) showing general locations for sampling and measurement. Arrows in front of the heaters indicate hot air exhaust directions.

Figure 3. South-end view of barn 2, showing some of the measurement locations.

Figure 3. South-end view of barn 2, showing some of the measurement locations.

Table 1. Fan numbers and ventilation stages for the finishing rooms

Table 2. Characteristics of the finishing barns

Table 3. Gas concentration data validation and interpolation requirements

Figure 4. Effects of the zero/span gas challenge line and loaded filter after one-month's exposure at average PM10 concentration of 625 μg/m3, on the analyzer response time for (a) NH3, (b) H2S, (c) CH4, and (d) CO2.

Figure 4. Effects of the zero/span gas challenge line and loaded filter after one-month's exposure at average PM10 concentration of 625 μg/m3, on the analyzer response time for (a) NH3, (b) H2S, (c) CH4, and (d) CO2.

Figure 5. Responses of CH4 using 55C analyzer (calibration gas of 230 ppm, tested on November 14, 2008) and NH3 using the PAMGA analyzer (calibration gas of 36 ppm, tested on January 9, 2009) at fan 6 sampling location of room 7.

Figure 5. Responses of CH4 using 55C analyzer (calibration gas of 230 ppm, tested on November 14, 2008) and NH3 using the PAMGA analyzer (calibration gas of 36 ppm, tested on January 9, 2009) at fan 6 sampling location of room 7.

Table 4. Effects of the PAMGA's sample integration time (SIT) on gas measurements

Figure 6. Results of pairwise TEOM collocation for PM2.5 (top), PM10 (center) and TSP (bottom).

Figure 6. Results of pairwise TEOM collocation for PM2.5 (top), PM10 (center) and TSP (bottom).

Figure 7. Response of thermocouple check using ice-water and hot-water baths at location fan 1 sampling location of room 5.

Figure 7. Response of thermocouple check using ice-water and hot-water baths at location fan 1 sampling location of room 5.

Figure 8. Results of zero checks of dP sensors in rooms 5 and 6.

Figure 8. Results of zero checks of dP sensors in rooms 5 and 6.

Figure 9. Manure depths measured in the manure pit. Each arrow indicates manure load-out.

Figure 9. Manure depths measured in the manure pit. Each arrow indicates manure load-out.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.