Figures & data
Table 1. Characteristics of the fern chips and their packed bed
Table 2. Operating conditions and nutrition rates
Table 3. GC-MSD data for the emitted VOCs from the smelting of recycled nylon at 250 °C
Figure 4. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of the biofilter (BF) and the biofilter plus the granular activated column (GAC) (BF+GAC) in experiment phase II (54 days) with a gas EBRT of 23.5 sec through the BF column.
![Figure 4. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of the biofilter (BF) and the biofilter plus the granular activated column (GAC) (BF+GAC) in experiment phase II (54 days) with a gas EBRT of 23.5 sec through the BF column.](/cms/asset/3648857d-c32f-46d3-932a-a9e6af47fe5a/uawm_a_823893_o_f0004g.gif)
Figure 5. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of BF and BF+GAC in experiment phase III (29 days) with a gas EBRT of 11.8 sec through the BF column.
![Figure 5. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of BF and BF+GAC in experiment phase III (29 days) with a gas EBRT of 11.8 sec through the BF column.](/cms/asset/6b43f2bf-c165-40ea-9366-754d808a83df/uawm_a_823893_o_f0005g.gif)
Figure 6. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of BF and BF+GAC in experiment phase IV (12 days) with a gas EBRT of 5.9 sec through the BF column.
![Figure 6. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of BF and BF+GAC in experiment phase IV (12 days) with a gas EBRT of 5.9 sec through the BF column.](/cms/asset/a9740b9f-b926-4580-b543-4f2a45124472/uawm_a_823893_o_f0006g.gif)
Figure 8. Variation of the volumetric VOC elimination capacity (K) with its loading (L) to the whole biomedia in experiment phases II, III, and IV. K/L = 0.78 indicates an average THC removal efficiency of 78% with L < 1 g m−3 hr−1.
![Figure 8. Variation of the volumetric VOC elimination capacity (K) with its loading (L) to the whole biomedia in experiment phases II, III, and IV. K/L = 0.78 indicates an average THC removal efficiency of 78% with L < 1 g m−3 hr−1.](/cms/asset/74f8ba93-490f-4286-8fef-51d6ef34f4e6/uawm_a_823893_o_f0008g.gif)