801
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

Biofiltration of odorous fume emitted from recycled nylon melting operations

, &
Pages 1343-1351 | Published online: 16 Oct 2013

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a plastic smelting and extrusion system.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a plastic smelting and extrusion system.

Figure 2. Schematics of the experimental system.

Figure 2. Schematics of the experimental system.

Table 1. Characteristics of the fern chips and their packed bed

Table 2. Operating conditions and nutrition rates

Table 3. GC-MSD data for the emitted VOCs from the smelting of recycled nylon at 250 °C

Figure 3. Time variations of EBRT, THC concentrations, and removal efficiency.

Figure 3. Time variations of EBRT, THC concentrations, and removal efficiency.

Figure 4. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of the biofilter (BF) and the biofilter plus the granular activated column (GAC) (BF+GAC) in experiment phase II (54 days) with a gas EBRT of 23.5 sec through the BF column.

Figure 4. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of the biofilter (BF) and the biofilter plus the granular activated column (GAC) (BF+GAC) in experiment phase II (54 days) with a gas EBRT of 23.5 sec through the BF column.

Figure 5. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of BF and BF+GAC in experiment phase III (29 days) with a gas EBRT of 11.8 sec through the BF column.

Figure 5. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of BF and BF+GAC in experiment phase III (29 days) with a gas EBRT of 11.8 sec through the BF column.

Figure 6. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of BF and BF+GAC in experiment phase IV (12 days) with a gas EBRT of 5.9 sec through the BF column.

Figure 6. Time variations of THC concentrations and removal efficiencies of BF and BF+GAC in experiment phase IV (12 days) with a gas EBRT of 5.9 sec through the BF column.

Figure 7. Time variations of medium pH and THC removal efficiency.

Figure 7. Time variations of medium pH and THC removal efficiency.

Figure 8. Variation of the volumetric VOC elimination capacity (K) with its loading (L) to the whole biomedia in experiment phases II, III, and IV. K/L = 0.78 indicates an average THC removal efficiency of 78% with L < 1 g m−3 hr−1.

Figure 8. Variation of the volumetric VOC elimination capacity (K) with its loading (L) to the whole biomedia in experiment phases II, III, and IV. K/L = 0.78 indicates an average THC removal efficiency of 78% with L < 1 g m−3 hr−1.

Table 4. Removal of commonly found VOCs in laboratory biofilters and biotrickling filters

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.