2,888
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

An uncertainty analysis of mean flow velocity measurements used to quantify emissions from stationary sources

, , , &
Pages 679-689 | Received 12 Nov 2013, Accepted 06 Jan 2014, Published online: 20 May 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. (a) Natural-gas burner under the largest of three exhaust hoods (1, large, 9 m × 12 m; 2, medium, 6 m × 6 m; 3, small, 3 m × 3 m). (b) Portion of the exhaust duct on the roof of the facility and upstream of the pollution control system.

Figure 1. (a) Natural-gas burner under the largest of three exhaust hoods (1, large, 9 m × 12 m; 2, medium, 6 m × 6 m; 3, small, 3 m × 3 m). (b) Portion of the exhaust duct on the roof of the facility and upstream of the pollution control system.

Figure 2. View of the velocity traverse plane located 9.2 D downstream of 180º bend, and the Annubar located 2.9 D downstream of traverse plane.

Figure 2. View of the velocity traverse plane located 9.2 D downstream of 180º bend, and the Annubar located 2.9 D downstream of traverse plane.

Figure 3. CFD mesh showing the geometry of the exhaust duct and the location of the traversing plane relative to the 180° bend in the duct.

Figure 3. CFD mesh showing the geometry of the exhaust duct and the location of the traversing plane relative to the 180° bend in the duct.

Table 1. Uncertainty budget for Series 1 point velocity measurements

Figure 4. Measured (symbols) and simulated (dashed line) velocity distributions on chord 1 and chord 2 for ambient (open symbols) and heated (closed symbols) flow conditions, with flow starting at the large hood. The natural gas burner is located under the southwest (SW) corner of the exhaust hood. The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; the nominal value is listed in .

Figure 4. Measured (symbols) and simulated (dashed line) velocity distributions on chord 1 and chord 2 for ambient (open symbols) and heated (closed symbols) flow conditions, with flow starting at the large hood. The natural gas burner is located under the southwest (SW) corner of the exhaust hood. The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; the nominal value is listed in Table 1.

Table 2. Uncertainty budget for Series 2 point velocity measurements, with standard uncertainty estimates derived from EPA (Method 2 or 2G) and ASTM (D 3154) standard test methods

Figure 5. Series 2 velocity profiles for ambient flow conditions in the large exhaust hood. Sample locations correspond to centroid of equal area positions. The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; the range of uncertainty is stated in the associated text.

Figure 5. Series 2 velocity profiles for ambient flow conditions in the large exhaust hood. Sample locations correspond to centroid of equal area positions. The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; the range of uncertainty is stated in the associated text.

Figure 6. Series 2 velocity profiles for heated flow conditions in the large exhaust hood. Sample locations correspond to centroid of equal area positions. The natural gas burner was located under the southwest (SW) corner as well as the center (C) of the exhaust hood. The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; the range of uncertainty is stated in the associated text.

Figure 6. Series 2 velocity profiles for heated flow conditions in the large exhaust hood. Sample locations correspond to centroid of equal area positions. The natural gas burner was located under the southwest (SW) corner as well as the center (C) of the exhaust hood. The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; the range of uncertainty is stated in the associated text.

Figure 7. Slice view of axial velocity at z = 9.2D downstream of the 180° bend.

Figure 7. Slice view of axial velocity at z = 9.2D downstream of the 180° bend.

Figure 8. Distribution of discretization error with orientation of traverse chords.

Figure 8. Distribution of discretization error with orientation of traverse chords.

Figure 9. Range of maximum potential discretization error with respect to number of sampling locations, number of sampling chords, and numerical integration technique.

Figure 9. Range of maximum potential discretization error with respect to number of sampling locations, number of sampling chords, and numerical integration technique.

Figure 10. Comparison of mean flow velocity computed as an arithmetic average (EPA) and as the result of numerical integrations (trapezoid, Simpsons, and Gauss–Legendre). The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; nominal values are listed in .

Figure 10. Comparison of mean flow velocity computed as an arithmetic average (EPA) and as the result of numerical integrations (trapezoid, Simpsons, and Gauss–Legendre). The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; nominal values are listed in Table 3.

Table 3. Nominal values for the relative uncertainty, , of the estimate for mean flow velocity

Figure 11. Comparison of Series 1 and Series 2 mean flow velocity measurements. The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; nominal values are listed in .

Figure 11. Comparison of Series 1 and Series 2 mean flow velocity measurements. The uncertainty bars correspond to a 95% confidence interval; nominal values are listed in Table 3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.