1,654
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

Updated methods for assessing the impacts of nearby gas drilling and production on neighborhood air quality and human health

, , , , &
Pages 173-183 | Received 13 Jun 2015, Accepted 13 Aug 2015, Published online: 15 Jan 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. One-hour measurements of HCHO (indicated in red) during the BSEEC (Citation2010) study at a pipeline compressor station in the Barnett Shale in the afternoon of June 11, 2010. Note that the top of the figure points northward.

Figure 1. One-hour measurements of HCHO (indicated in red) during the BSEEC (Citation2010) study at a pipeline compressor station in the Barnett Shale in the afternoon of June 11, 2010. Note that the top of the figure points northward.

Table 1. Most important hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emitted by the oil and gas industry and their effects screening level (ESL) values as determined by the state of Texas.

Table 2. Measurements of wind speed and direction in the afternoon of June 11, 2010, at the pipeline compressor station during the BSEEC (Citation2010) study.

Table 3. Model-inferred HCHO concentrations vs. measurements from BSEEC (Citation2010) study.

Figure 2. Airflow (blue streamlines) near the surface at the oil and gas site of in the afternoon of June 11, 2010, as simulated by the QUIC urban wind model assuming a southerly background wind. Also shown are 1-hr average ambient concentrations of HCHO (indicated in red) simulated by the HARC air quality model based on assimilated measurements from the BSEEC (Citation2010) study.

Figure 2. Airflow (blue streamlines) near the surface at the oil and gas site of Figure 1 in the afternoon of June 11, 2010, as simulated by the QUIC urban wind model assuming a southerly background wind. Also shown are 1-hr average ambient concentrations of HCHO (indicated in red) simulated by the HARC air quality model based on assimilated measurements from the BSEEC (Citation2010) study.

Figure 3. (Left) Mobile Acquisition of Real-Time Concentrations (MARC) vehicle. (Right) Position of anemometer and sample inlet mounted on top of MARC.

Figure 3. (Left) Mobile Acquisition of Real-Time Concentrations (MARC) vehicle. (Right) Position of anemometer and sample inlet mounted on top of MARC.

Figure 4. Example of plume tracking with MARC as it passes periodically through the plume of a large flare. The gaps are associated with periods where numerous barscans were performed to aid in identifying other potential hazardous pollutant emissions.

Figure 4. Example of plume tracking with MARC as it passes periodically through the plume of a large flare. The gaps are associated with periods where numerous barscans were performed to aid in identifying other potential hazardous pollutant emissions.

Figure 5. Barscan of an emission plume related to oil and gas production operations.

Figure 5. Barscan of an emission plume related to oil and gas production operations.

Figure 6. Diagram of dehumidifier system.

Figure 6. Diagram of dehumidifier system.

Figure 7. Hypothetical Web browser screenshot of the MARC real-time data broadcasting system. The actual site of the experiment in the Eagle Ford Shale cannot be shown due to a nondisclosure agreement.

Figure 7. Hypothetical Web browser screenshot of the MARC real-time data broadcasting system. The actual site of the experiment in the Eagle Ford Shale cannot be shown due to a nondisclosure agreement.

Figure 8. Mobile lab trajectory and corresponding benzene measurements at a natural gas production facility in the Eagle Ford Shale on the day a major flare was observed to be in operation.

Figure 8. Mobile lab trajectory and corresponding benzene measurements at a natural gas production facility in the Eagle Ford Shale on the day a major flare was observed to be in operation.

Figure 9. Isopleths of the surface concentration of benzene after 2 hr of flare emission inferred from MARC observations during the Eagle Ford study. Markers denote sensitive receptors.

Figure 9. Isopleths of the surface concentration of benzene after 2 hr of flare emission inferred from MARC observations during the Eagle Ford study. Markers denote sensitive receptors.

Figure 10. Same as in Figure 8, but for the worst-case scenario.

Figure 10. Same as in Figure 8, but for the worst-case scenario.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.