1,821
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

Comparison of titania nanotubes and titanium dioxide as supports of low-temperature selective catalytic reduction catalysts under sulfur dioxide poisoning

, &
Pages 292-305 | Received 16 May 2016, Accepted 18 Aug 2016, Published online: 20 Sep 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup.

Table 1. Characterization of the MnFe-TiO2 and MnFe-TNT catalysts.

Figure 2. SEM images of catalysts prepared at calcination temperature 350 °C: (a) MnFe-TiO(OH)2; (b) MnFe-TNT(TiO(OH)2).

Figure 2. SEM images of catalysts prepared at calcination temperature 350 °C: (a) MnFe-TiO(OH)2; (b) MnFe-TNT(TiO(OH)2).

Figure 3. XRD patterns of catalysts prepared under different calcination temperatures: (a) MnFe-TiO2; (b) MnFe-TNTs.

Figure 3. XRD patterns of catalysts prepared under different calcination temperatures: (a) MnFe-TiO2; (b) MnFe-TNTs.

Figure 4. NH3-TPD patterns of MnFe-TiO2 and MnFe-TNT catalysts at calcination temperature of 350 °C. The solid lines represent for the results of MnFe supported on TiO2, whereas the dash lines are for those on TNTs.

Figure 4. NH3-TPD patterns of MnFe-TiO2 and MnFe-TNT catalysts at calcination temperature of 350 °C. The solid lines represent for the results of MnFe supported on TiO2, whereas the dash lines are for those on TNTs.

Figure 5. NH3-TPD patterns of (a) MnFe-TiO2 and (b) MnFe-TNTs (both made from TiO(OH)2) calcined at different temperatures.

Figure 5. NH3-TPD patterns of (a) MnFe-TiO2 and (b) MnFe-TNTs (both made from TiO(OH)2) calcined at different temperatures.

Figure 6. Correlation between NH3-TPD desorption amounts (200~500 °C, Brønsted acid sites) and the specific surface areas of all TiO2- and TNT-based MnFe catalysts.

Figure 6. Correlation between NH3-TPD desorption amounts (200~500 °C, Brønsted acid sites) and the specific surface areas of all TiO2- and TNT-based MnFe catalysts.

Figure 7. Comparison of NO conversion between TiO2- and TNT- (both made from TiO(OH)2) based MnFe catalysts calcined at 350 °C in the NH3-SCR reaction. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Figure 7. Comparison of NO conversion between TiO2- and TNT- (both made from TiO(OH)2) based MnFe catalysts calcined at 350 °C in the NH3-SCR reaction. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Figure 8. NO conversion with and without the presence of SO2 in the NH3-SCR reaction over MnFe-TiO2 and MnFe-TNT (both made from TiO(OH)2) catalysts at different calcination temperatures. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Figure 8. NO conversion with and without the presence of SO2 in the NH3-SCR reaction over MnFe-TiO2 and MnFe-TNT (both made from TiO(OH)2) catalysts at different calcination temperatures. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Figure 9. The effect of specific surface area of catalysts on the NO conversion at SCR temperature of 150 °C with and without the presence of SO2. The data of without SO2 were averaged over 3 hr of operation time, whereas the data with SO2 was after 5 hr of SO2 poisoning.

Figure 9. The effect of specific surface area of catalysts on the NO conversion at SCR temperature of 150 °C with and without the presence of SO2. The data of without SO2 were averaged over 3 hr of operation time, whereas the data with SO2 was after 5 hr of SO2 poisoning.

Figure 10. XPS spectra of Mn 2p spectra for (a) MnFe-TiO2 and (b) MnFe-TNTs before and after poisoning by SO2. The two MnFe-TiO2 and MnFe-TNT catalysts were both made from TiO(OH)2.

Figure 10. XPS spectra of Mn 2p spectra for (a) MnFe-TiO2 and (b) MnFe-TNTs before and after poisoning by SO2. The two MnFe-TiO2 and MnFe-TNT catalysts were both made from TiO(OH)2.

Figure 11. Effect of gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) on the NO conversion over the MnFe-TNT(TiO(OH)2)(350) catalyst. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air.

Figure 11. Effect of gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) on the NO conversion over the MnFe-TNT(TiO(OH)2)(350) catalyst. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air.

Figure 12. Effect of reaction temperature on the NO conversion over the MnFe-TNT(TiO(OH)2)(350) catalyst. Reaction conditions: [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Figure 12. Effect of reaction temperature on the NO conversion over the MnFe-TNT(TiO(OH)2)(350) catalyst. Reaction conditions: [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Figure 13. Effect of [NH3]/[NO] ratio on the NO conversion over the MnFe-TNT(TiO(OH)2)(350) catalyst. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200~400 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Figure 13. Effect of [NH3]/[NO] ratio on the NO conversion over the MnFe-TNT(TiO(OH)2)(350) catalyst. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200~400 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Figure 14. (a) TGA spectra and (b) DTG spectra of fresh and poisoned catalysts. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Figure 14. (a) TGA spectra and (b) DTG spectra of fresh and poisoned catalysts. Reaction conditions: reaction temperature = 150 °C, [NO] = 220 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, [O2] = 15%, balanced with air, and GHSV = 20,000 hr−1.

Table 2. The specific surface areas after SO2 poisoning and the amounts of SO2 poisoning products on the MnFe-TiO(OH)2 and MnFe-TNT(TiO(OH)2) catalysts.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.