2,908
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

Modeling to Evaluate Contribution of Oil and Gas Emissions to Air Pollution

, , , &
Pages 445-461 | Received 16 May 2016, Accepted 22 Sep 2016, Published online: 10 Mar 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. The CAMx modeling domain showing the outer 36-km domain covering the entire United States and the nested 12-km domain covering the western U.S. national parks, which are outlined in blue, and non-NPs Class I areas, which are in green. The extent of major U.S. oil and gas basins as of 2011 is shown in pink.

Figure 1. The CAMx modeling domain showing the outer 36-km domain covering the entire United States and the nested 12-km domain covering the western U.S. national parks, which are outlined in blue, and non-NPs Class I areas, which are in green. The extent of major U.S. oil and gas basins as of 2011 is shown in pink.

Figure 2. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to the fourth highest daily maximum 8-hr averaged ozone concentration in ppb. National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 2. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to the fourth highest daily maximum 8-hr averaged ozone concentration in ppb. National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 3. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to annual average PM2.5 concentration. National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 3. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to annual average PM2.5 concentration. National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 4. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to visibility on the 20% haziest days. National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 4. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to visibility on the 20% haziest days. National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 5. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to visibility on the 20% clearest days. National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 5. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to visibility on the 20% clearest days. National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 6. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to total nitrogen deposition (kg N/ha/year). National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 6. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to total nitrogen deposition (kg N/ha/year). National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 7. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to the annual maximum W126 ozone concentration (ppm-hr). National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Figure 7. Modeled contribution of emissions associated with oil and gas production activity to the annual maximum W126 ozone concentration (ppm-hr). National parks and Class I areas are outlined in black.

Table 1. Twenty national parks and Class I areas with the largest contribution of oil and gas emissions to the fourth highest daily maximum 8-hr ozone concentration (ppb).

Table 2. Twenty national parks and Class I areas with the largest contribution of oil and gas emissions to the W126 ozone metric (ppm-hr).

Table 3. Twenty national parks and Class I areas with the largest contribution of oil and gas emissions to the average visibility index ranked by the impact on the 20% haziest days (dv), and the number of days the modeled oil and gas impact to visibility is greater than 0.5 dv and 1.0 dv.

Table 4. Twenty national parks and Class I areas with the largest contribution of oil and gas emissions to total nitrogen deposition (Ndep).

Figure 8. Colorado national parks and Class I areas showing total modeled nitrogen deposition results both with (lighter red horizontal bar) and without (darker red horizontal bar) oil and gas emissions, plus the lower range critical load values for four endpoints (vertical bars).

Figure 8. Colorado national parks and Class I areas showing total modeled nitrogen deposition results both with (lighter red horizontal bar) and without (darker red horizontal bar) oil and gas emissions, plus the lower range critical load values for four endpoints (vertical bars).
Supplemental material

Supplemental_Information_R2R.docx

Download MS Word (4.2 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.