1,436
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

Comparing emission rates derived from a model with those estimated using a plume-based approach and quantifying the contribution of vehicle classes to on-road emissions and air quality

, , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1159-1174 | Received 21 Jan 2018, Accepted 31 May 2018, Published online: 11 Jul 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Study area and data collection sites.

Figure 1. Study area and data collection sites.

Figure 2. The traffic simulation network (using the PTV Vissim platform).

Figure 2. The traffic simulation network (using the PTV Vissim platform).

Figure 3. Comparison of hourly traffic volumes between radar records and manual counts in (a) the WB direction and (b) the EB direction.

Figure 3. Comparison of hourly traffic volumes between radar records and manual counts in (a) the WB direction and (b) the EB direction.

Figure 4. Hourly truck volumes and truck proportions on Thursday and Sunday. (Based on webcam/manual results.)

Figure 4. Hourly truck volumes and truck proportions on Thursday and Sunday. (Based on webcam/manual results.)

Figure 5. Box plots of hourly emission factors (EFs) derived from emission model and plume-based method for weekday and weekend: (a) distribution of hourly nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission factors; (b) distribution of hourly carbon monoxide (CO) emission factors. Boxes represent the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentiles), and whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. Dots indicate outliers, and crosses refer to mean values.

Figure 5. Box plots of hourly emission factors (EFs) derived from emission model and plume-based method for weekday and weekend: (a) distribution of hourly nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission factors; (b) distribution of hourly carbon monoxide (CO) emission factors. Boxes represent the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentiles), and whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. Dots indicate outliers, and crosses refer to mean values.

Figure 6. Box plots of hourly segment emissions (left) and stacked bar charts of average proportions of transit buses, trucks, and other vehicles (right) for transit bus and streetcar networks: (a) distribution of hourly carbon monoxide (CO) emissions (left) and contribution of vehicle classes (right); (b) distribution of hourly nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions (left) and contribution of vehicle classes (right); (c) distribution of hourly elemental carbon (EC) emissions (left) and contribution of vehicle classes (right). The transit bus and streetcar in the parentheses refer to transit bus network and streetcar network, respectively. Boxes represent the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentiles), and whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. Dots indicate outliers, and crosses refer to mean values.

Figure 6. Box plots of hourly segment emissions (left) and stacked bar charts of average proportions of transit buses, trucks, and other vehicles (right) for transit bus and streetcar networks: (a) distribution of hourly carbon monoxide (CO) emissions (left) and contribution of vehicle classes (right); (b) distribution of hourly nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions (left) and contribution of vehicle classes (right); (c) distribution of hourly elemental carbon (EC) emissions (left) and contribution of vehicle classes (right). The transit bus and streetcar in the parentheses refer to transit bus network and streetcar network, respectively. Boxes represent the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentiles), and whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. Dots indicate outliers, and crosses refer to mean values.

Figure 7. Stacked bar charts of relative contribution of vehicle classes to air quality: (a) relative contribution of vehicle classes to CO concentrations; (b) relative contribution of vehicle classes to NOx concentrations; (c) relative contribution of vehicle classes to EC concentrations.

Figure 7. Stacked bar charts of relative contribution of vehicle classes to air quality: (a) relative contribution of vehicle classes to CO concentrations; (b) relative contribution of vehicle classes to NOx concentrations; (c) relative contribution of vehicle classes to EC concentrations.

Table 1. Ratios of EFs between transit bus and fleet average, and ratios of per passenger emissions between transit bus and private vehicles.

Figure 8. Box plots of hourly concentrations derived from emission model and plume-based method, as well as measured concentrations at street level, for two pollutants: (a) distribution of hourly nitrogen oxide (NOx) concentrations; (b) distribution of hourly carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations. Boxes represent the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentiles), and whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. Dots indicate outliers, and crosses refer to mean values.

Figure 8. Box plots of hourly concentrations derived from emission model and plume-based method, as well as measured concentrations at street level, for two pollutants: (a) distribution of hourly nitrogen oxide (NOx) concentrations; (b) distribution of hourly carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations. Boxes represent the interquartile range (25th to 75th percentiles), and whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. Dots indicate outliers, and crosses refer to mean values.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (669.2 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.