790
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

Shift of microbial diversity and function in high-efficiency performance biotrickling filter for gaseous xylene treatment

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1059-1069 | Received 21 Nov 2018, Accepted 22 Mar 2019, Published online: 25 Jul 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic of the laboratory-scale biotrickling filter. (1) Air pump. (2) Air-mixing chamber. (3) Air rotameter. (4) Impinger for xylene. (5) Air inlet port. (6) Biotrickling filter. (7) Polyurethane packing. (8) Air outlet port. (9) Nutrient medium peristaltic pump. (10) NaOH solution. (11) Lye peristaltic pump. (12) pH online monitor. (13) Nutrient medium. (14) Magnetic stirrer. (15) Support table.

Figure 1. Schematic of the laboratory-scale biotrickling filter. (1) Air pump. (2) Air-mixing chamber. (3) Air rotameter. (4) Impinger for xylene. (5) Air inlet port. (6) Biotrickling filter. (7) Polyurethane packing. (8) Air outlet port. (9) Nutrient medium peristaltic pump. (10) NaOH solution. (11) Lye peristaltic pump. (12) pH online monitor. (13) Nutrient medium. (14) Magnetic stirrer. (15) Support table.

Figure 2. Time-dependent xylene concentration and removal with operating time.

Figure 2. Time-dependent xylene concentration and removal with operating time.

Figure 3. Production of carbon dioxide as a function of elimination capacity.

Figure 3. Production of carbon dioxide as a function of elimination capacity.

Figure 4. Determination of Michaelis-Menten kinetic constants for xylene degradation.

Figure 4. Determination of Michaelis-Menten kinetic constants for xylene degradation.

Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of weighted UniFrac distances of the bacterial communities in different samples. T: top samples; M: middle samples; B: bottom samples.

Figure 5. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of weighted UniFrac distances of the bacterial communities in different samples. T: top samples; M: middle samples; B: bottom samples.

Figure 6. Abundances of different bacterial genera in the samples. The abundance is presented in terms of percentage among the total effective bacterial sequences in each sample. The top 10 abound taxa are shown.

Figure 6. Abundances of different bacterial genera in the samples. The abundance is presented in terms of percentage among the total effective bacterial sequences in each sample. The top 10 abound taxa are shown.

Table 1. Statistically significant differences in genera of the top 10 relative abundance levels in different samples.

Figure 7. Heatmap of functional community profiles. T: top samples; M: middle samples; B: bottom samples.

Figure 7. Heatmap of functional community profiles. T: top samples; M: middle samples; B: bottom samples.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.