1,225
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

Insights into the effect of the shape of collecting plates on particle precipitation processes in an electrostatic precipitator

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 892-903 | Received 16 Jan 2020, Accepted 02 May 2020, Published online: 14 Aug 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of seven kinds of dust collecting plates.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of seven kinds of dust collecting plates.

Table 1. Electrostatic precipitator parameters and operating parameters.

Figure 2. Computational mesh of the Rod-curtain type electrostatic precipitator.

Figure 2. Computational mesh of the Rod-curtain type electrostatic precipitator.

Table 2. Boundary conditions in electrostatic precipitator.

Figure 3. Implementation method and connection between physical modules.

Figure 3. Implementation method and connection between physical modules.

Figure 4. Comparison of potential computed with present model and experimental results by Penny & Matick.

Figure 4. Comparison of potential computed with present model and experimental results by Penny & Matick.

Figure 5. Comparison of flow streamlines computed in this paper.

Figure 5. Comparison of flow streamlines computed in this paper.

Figure 6. Comparison of dust removal efficiency.

Figure 6. Comparison of dust removal efficiency.

Figure 7. Magnitude of electric field strength (V / m) when using different shapes of collecting plates.

Figure 7. Magnitude of electric field strength (V / m) when using different shapes of collecting plates.

Figure 8. Effect of the shape of collecting plate on V–I characteristics.

Figure 8. Effect of the shape of collecting plate on V–I characteristics.

Figure 9. Charge density distribution curve of plate.

Figure 9. Charge density distribution curve of plate.

Figure 10. Space charge density(C/m3) distribution cloud map.

Figure 10. Space charge density(C/m3) distribution cloud map.

Figure 11. Comparison of space charge density on the surface of three discharge electrodes.

Figure 11. Comparison of space charge density on the surface of three discharge electrodes.

Figure 12. ESP streamline distribution (v = 0 m/s).

Figure 12. ESP streamline distribution (v = 0 m/s).

Figure 13. ESP streamline distribution (v = 1.0 m/s).

Figure 13. ESP streamline distribution (v = 1.0 m/s).

Figure 14. Relationship between the shape of collecting plates and the collection efficiency.

Figure 14. Relationship between the shape of collecting plates and the collection efficiency.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.