1,816
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Paper

Highly efficient recovery of molybdenum from spent catalyst by an optimized process

, , , , , & show all
Pages 971-979 | Received 18 Dec 2019, Accepted 24 Jun 2020, Published online: 07 Aug 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Chemical composition of spent catalyst.

Table 2. Results of the leaching process.

Figure 1. Effect of initial pH on molybdenum extraction behavior with different extractants under the same extractants concentration, extraction time, and O/A ratio.

Figure 1. Effect of initial pH on molybdenum extraction behavior with different extractants under the same extractants concentration, extraction time, and O/A ratio.

Figure 2. Effect of extractants concentration on molybdenum extraction behavior with different extractants under the same initial pH, extraction time, and O/A ratio.

Figure 2. Effect of extractants concentration on molybdenum extraction behavior with different extractants under the same initial pH, extraction time, and O/A ratio.

Figure 3. Molybdenum extraction slope analysis for five different extractants under the same initial pH, extraction time, and O/A ratio.

Figure 3. Molybdenum extraction slope analysis for five different extractants under the same initial pH, extraction time, and O/A ratio.

Figure 4. Effect of extraction time on molybdenum extraction behavior with different extractants under the same extractants concentration, initial pH, and O/A ratio.

Figure 4. Effect of extraction time on molybdenum extraction behavior with different extractants under the same extractants concentration, initial pH, and O/A ratio.

Figure 5. McCabe–Thiele plot for molybdenum extraction with 0.05 mol/L Alamine 336 at initial aqueous pH of 1 and extraction time of 5 min.

Figure 5. McCabe–Thiele plot for molybdenum extraction with 0.05 mol/L Alamine 336 at initial aqueous pH of 1 and extraction time of 5 min.

Table 3. Results of the two-stage counter current extraction of molybdenum.

Figure 6. Effect of stripping agent concentration on molybdenum stripping behavior with different stripping agent under the same stripping time and O/A ratio.

Figure 6. Effect of stripping agent concentration on molybdenum stripping behavior with different stripping agent under the same stripping time and O/A ratio.

Figure 7. Effect of stripping time on molybdenum stripping behavior with different stripping agent under the same stripping agent concentration and O/A ratio.

Figure 7. Effect of stripping time on molybdenum stripping behavior with different stripping agent under the same stripping agent concentration and O/A ratio.

Figure 8. McCabe–Thiele plot for molybdenum stripping with 0.15 mol/L NaOH and 4 min stripping time.

Figure 8. McCabe–Thiele plot for molybdenum stripping with 0.15 mol/L NaOH and 4 min stripping time.

Table 4. Results of the two-stage counter current stripping of molybdenum.

Figure 9. FTIR spectra of organic phase during extraction and stripping process (a) fresh organic phase, (b) loaded organic phase, and (c) organic phase after stripping.

Figure 9. FTIR spectra of organic phase during extraction and stripping process (a) fresh organic phase, (b) loaded organic phase, and (c) organic phase after stripping.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.