566
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

Comparison of melt-blown and glass-fiber HEPA asbestos filters based on ISO filter classes, filtration efficiency, power consumption, and face velocity

&
Pages 271-280 | Received 06 Nov 2020, Accepted 24 May 2021, Published online: 04 Oct 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Parameters and values of automated filter tester and particle filtration

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the TOPAS air filter test system.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the TOPAS air filter test system.

Figure 2. Layout of melt-blown filter assembly by class 11, 12, 13.

Figure 2. Layout of melt-blown filter assembly by class 11, 12, 13.

Figure 3. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filters by particle size with 1 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filters.

Figure 3. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filters by particle size with 1 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filters.

Figure 4. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filters by particle size with 2 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filter.

Figure 4. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filters by particle size with 2 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filter.

Figure 5. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filter by particle size with 3 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filters.

Figure 5. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filter by particle size with 3 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filters.

Figure 6. Variation of pressure in HEPA filter by dust loading amount at 1 m/s by classes (a), and H13 class by face velocity (b).

Figure 6. Variation of pressure in HEPA filter by dust loading amount at 1 m/s by classes (a), and H13 class by face velocity (b).

Figure 7. Morphological structures of melt-blown and glass-fiber media (H13) taken before and after dust loading using an electronic microscope.

Figure 7. Morphological structures of melt-blown and glass-fiber media (H13) taken before and after dust loading using an electronic microscope.

Figure 8. Comparison of power consumption between melt-blown and glass-fiber media by increasing flow rate through class H13 filters (p < .05).

Figure 8. Comparison of power consumption between melt-blown and glass-fiber media by increasing flow rate through class H13 filters (p < .05).

Table 2. Characteristics of filter media by class

Table 3. Comparison of efficiency by particle size, between melt-blown and glass-fiber filters in a negative air machine

Table 4. Application of melt-blown filter media in negative air machines to asbestos removal sites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.