Figures & data
Table 1. Parameters and values of automated filter tester and particle filtration
Figure 3. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filters by particle size with 1 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filters.
![Figure 3. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filters by particle size with 1 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filters.](/cms/asset/c80f02df-ecc1-431a-8054-b465f502ac07/uawm_a_1962431_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filters by particle size with 2 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filter.
![Figure 4. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filters by particle size with 2 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filter.](/cms/asset/bdeb329f-f26d-4249-b3cd-98a6ee2e7e4e/uawm_a_1962431_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filter by particle size with 3 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filters.
![Figure 5. Fractional efficiency of melt-blown filter by particle size with 3 m/s face velocity through class E11, E12, and H13 filters.](/cms/asset/70a9441c-eef5-41df-acea-e7b61337a947/uawm_a_1962431_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Variation of pressure in HEPA filter by dust loading amount at 1 m/s by classes (a), and H13 class by face velocity (b).
![Figure 6. Variation of pressure in HEPA filter by dust loading amount at 1 m/s by classes (a), and H13 class by face velocity (b).](/cms/asset/8d003c76-26f0-4e19-81fd-0b4b9fbe61d3/uawm_a_1962431_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. Morphological structures of melt-blown and glass-fiber media (H13) taken before and after dust loading using an electronic microscope.
![Figure 7. Morphological structures of melt-blown and glass-fiber media (H13) taken before and after dust loading using an electronic microscope.](/cms/asset/089f40ac-cf8d-4449-a9a3-c08ff180951d/uawm_a_1962431_f0007_b.gif)
Figure 8. Comparison of power consumption between melt-blown and glass-fiber media by increasing flow rate through class H13 filters (p < .05).
![Figure 8. Comparison of power consumption between melt-blown and glass-fiber media by increasing flow rate through class H13 filters (p < .05).](/cms/asset/3426c437-170f-478b-93d2-d2258022d3b9/uawm_a_1962431_f0008_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Characteristics of filter media by class
Table 3. Comparison of efficiency by particle size, between melt-blown and glass-fiber filters in a negative air machine
Table 4. Application of melt-blown filter media in negative air machines to asbestos removal sites