Figures & data
Figure 1. (a) Process for handling low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste from the generating facility to the disposal site. (b) a schematic of the proposed radioactive waste tracking system.
![Figure 1. (a) Process for handling low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste from the generating facility to the disposal site. (b) a schematic of the proposed radioactive waste tracking system.](/cms/asset/f45d1c25-1edb-4281-a1fc-0445dc291943/uawm_a_2149636_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. (a) NFC test configuration for drum positioning performance. Performance test on (b) a regular wooden table and (c) metal drum.
![Figure 2. (a) NFC test configuration for drum positioning performance. Performance test on (b) a regular wooden table and (c) metal drum.](/cms/asset/0bc7bd9f-f8cb-4e64-919c-80e661bb53d9/uawm_a_2149636_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Models and manufacturers of the modules used on a pallet.
Figure 5. (a) Position of the attached magnetic sensor on a drum and (b) configuration of the magnetic sensors.
![Figure 5. (a) Position of the attached magnetic sensor on a drum and (b) configuration of the magnetic sensors.](/cms/asset/14bc9f1b-3ea5-4188-8b9a-cc51a4ab297d/uawm_a_2149636_f0005_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Operational vertical distance range according to the distance between NFC tag and drum surface.
Table 3. Results of the IR transmit/receive test.
Table 4. Test results according to the materials interfering with electromagnetic signals between the transmitting and receiving modules.
Table 5. Results from analysis of the sensor characteristics according to the position of the magnetic sensor.
Table 6. Estimated power consumption of a drum node.
Table 7. Estimated power consumption of a pallet node.