Independence: proposing an initial framework for occupational therapy

Abstract

Background: The concept of independence is common in occupational therapy theory and practice but has rarely been clearly defined or conceptualized within in occupational therapy literature and there seems to be no standard definition. This can result in ambiguity, which potentially jeopardizes client-centred practice.

Aim: This paper proposes an occupational therapy independence framework (OTIF) that synthesizes the range of characterizations of independence in a practically useful and occupation-centred manner.

Methods: A review of literature, clinical experience, doctoral research and conversations with occupational therapists and disabled people, in particular those involved in a disability activism group and people with physical disabilities, has led to the development of the OTIF.

Results: Independence and interdependence, as characterized in the OTIF, occur when an individual exerts choice over occupational performance and can engage in occupations in a manner acceptable to the individual. Interdependence results when occupations are performed with another person whereas independence involves solitary occupational performance. Dependence typically results from inability to choose occupations or a mismatch between performance capacity and environmental factors.

Significance: The OTIF has the potential to clarify the conceptualization of independence within occupational therapy theory and practice. This initial proposal is presented to stimulate debate and discussion.

Keywords:

• Choice
• dependence
• disability
• interdependence
• occupational therapy theory
• practice

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank many occupational therapists and disability activist colleagues who have contributed to the development of this framework so far. In particular, he wishes to acknowledge the support from the late Dr Paul O’Mahony who supervised the doctoral work that influenced the framework. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Paul. The support of Dr. Bethan Roberts is acknowledged in preparing this manuscript for submission. Also, I wish to thank Jennifer Creek for her comments on an earlier version of this framework. No funding or financial support was received for this work.

Disclosure statement

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding

No funding or financial support was received for this work.