2,063
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Basic hemodynamics and noninvasive cardiac output (Bioimpedance ICON Cardiometer): A diagnostic reliability during percutaneous nephrolithotomy bleeding under spinal anesthesia

Basic hemodynamic monitoring reliability during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

, MDORCID Icon & , MDORCID Icon
Pages 77-84 | Received 14 May 2020, Accepted 08 Feb 2021, Published online: 20 Feb 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with significant blood loss in comparison with patients with non-significant loss

Table 2. Patients'’ characteristic at minute-120

Figure 1. Pattern of changes of STR over duration of procedure. Record of mean±SD of STR at minute-80 was higher in group of significant blood loss (0.44 ± 0.07 Vs 0.38 ± 0.05, P 0.018). Abbreviations; STR systolic time ratio (STR), significant (significant blood loss), Non-significant (Non-significant blood loss)

Figure 1. Pattern of changes of STR over duration of procedure. Record of mean±SD of STR at minute-80 was higher in group of significant blood loss (0.44 ± 0.07 Vs 0.38 ± 0.05, P 0.018). Abbreviations; STR systolic time ratio (STR), significant (significant blood loss), Non-significant (Non-significant blood loss)

Figure 2. Pattern of changes of heart rate (HR) over duration of procedure. Record of mean±SD of HR over time. Record of HR started to be significantly higher at minute-100 (87.5 ± 13 Vs.78.6 ± 12, P 0.05) Abbreviations; HR (heart rate), significant (significant blood loss), Non-significant (Non-significant blood loss)

Figure 2. Pattern of changes of heart rate (HR) over duration of procedure. Record of mean±SD of HR over time. Record of HR started to be significantly higher at minute-100 (87.5 ± 13 Vs.78.6 ± 12, P 0.05) Abbreviations; HR (heart rate), significant (significant blood loss), Non-significant (Non-significant blood loss)