Figures & data
Figure 2. Comparison of QOR 40 total score between the two studied groups. Values are presented as mean ±SD. *significant differences between groups P < 0.05.
![Figure 2. Comparison of QOR 40 total score between the two studied groups. Values are presented as mean ±SD. *significant differences between groups P < 0.05.](/cms/asset/f0ff4870-e97d-43eb-ac91-1f12a14aa127/teja_a_2196113_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Comparison of random blood sugar (mg/dL) between the two studied groups. Values are presented as mean ±SD. *significant differences between groups P < 0.05.
![Figure 3. Comparison of random blood sugar (mg/dL) between the two studied groups. Values are presented as mean ±SD. *significant differences between groups P < 0.05.](/cms/asset/0724db6a-4cdc-4266-ab36-8440614386d9/teja_a_2196113_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Comparison of visual analogue score (VAS) between the two studied groups. Values are presented as mean ±SD. *significant differences between groups P < 0.05.
![Figure 4. Comparison of visual analogue score (VAS) between the two studied groups. Values are presented as mean ±SD. *significant differences between groups P < 0.05.](/cms/asset/4c663bdf-ace9-440b-acf0-fa08895cf0e8/teja_a_2196113_f0004_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Demographic characteristics.
Table 2. Perioperative data.
Table 3. Comparison of C-reactive protein (mg-dl-1) and interleukin-6 (pg.Ml-1) between the two studied groups.