Effects of automatic gas control on sevoflurane gas monitor and recovery during pancreatico-duodenectomy operation: prospective randomized study

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flowchart of the studied groups.

Table 1. Patient’s characteristics.

Variable	AGC group (n = 20)	MGC group (n = 20)	P value
Age (years)	54.95 ± 9.17	61.05 ± 10.41	0.06NS
BMI (kg/m^2)	26.13 ± 4.13	26.35 ± 3.89	0.86NS
Sex (M/F)	13/7	16/4	0.48 NS
DM(Y/N)	3/17	4/16	1 NS
H (Y/N)	2/18	1/19	1NA
IHD (Y/N)	0/20	2/18	0.49NS
Duration of surgery (hrs.)	8.55 ± 1.73	8.28 ± 1.12	0.55NS

Table 2. Intraoperative hemodynamics in the studied groups.

Data	AGC group (n = 20)	MGC group (n = 20)	P value
HR (beat/min)	92.39 ± 13.59	85.95 ± 13.75	0.15NS
MAP (mmHg)	78.01 ± 5.22	76.94 ± 6.82	0.58 NS
COP (Liters/min)	6.63 ± 1.30	6.77 ± 1.94	0.79NS
SVR (dyn.sec.cm^−5)	892.11 ± 209.73	907.70 ± 286.59	0.85NS
FTC (msec)	328.16 ± 8.80	331.12 ± 10.04	0.33NS

Table 3. Anesthetic gas data in the studied groups.

Variable	Mean ±SD		P value
	AGC group (n = 20)	MGC group (n = 20)
IOF	685.00 ± 142.44	7.70 ± 1.59	0.08NS
Sevo.	58.80 ± 10.54	81.20 ± 16.47	<0.001*
ETSevo.	1.65 ± 0.06	1.84 ± 0.05	<0.001*
FISevo.	1.88 ± 0.09	2.17 ± 0.04	<0.001*
EtO2	43.32 ± 0.72	43.90 ± 0.67	0.01*
FiO2	39.96 ± 0.11	39.93 ± 0.13	0.37NS
FiO2	7.70 ± 1.59	14.10 ± 4.75	<0.001*

Table 4. BIS, soda lime consumed, and the number of interventions in the studied groups.

Variable	Mean ±SD
	AGC group (n = 20)	MGC group (n = 20)	P value
BIS	56.15 ± 2.53	56.03 ± 2.11	0.87NS
Soda lime (ml)	263.00 ± 56.95	244.50 ± 41.74	0.25NS
No. of intervention	5.50 ± 1.19	12.50 ± 1.88	<0.001 *