789
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Hemodynamic monitoring and correlation between electrical cardiometry and esophageal Doppler in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 418-425 | Received 22 Jan 2023, Accepted 27 Apr 2023, Published online: 11 May 2023

Figures & data

Table 1. Demographic data, ASA status, types, duration of surgery, fluid balance, hemodynamics, HR, and mean blood pressure at different times of followup of the studied group.

Figure 1. (A) Receiver operator characteristic curve demonstrating the sensitivity and the specificity of ICON and ED, (B) Bland Altman analysis of ICONCO and EDCO of CO results.

Figure 1. (A) Receiver operator characteristic curve demonstrating the sensitivity and the specificity of ICON and ED, (B) Bland Altman analysis of ICONCO and EDCO of CO results.

Table 2. Cardiac output (l/min) by the two methods at different time of follow-up.

Table 3. CI (l/min/m2), SV (ml/beat), SVI (ml/m2/beat), SVR (mmHg/min/ml), DO2I (ml O2/min/m2) by the two methods among the studied groups at different times of follow-up.

Figure 2. Bland Altman analysis of (A) ICONCI and EDCI of CI results, (B) ICONSV and EDSV of SV results, (C) ICONSVI and EDSVI of SVI results, (D) ICONSVR and EDSVR of SVR results, (E) ICONDO2I and EDDO2I of DO2 results.

Figure 2. Bland Altman analysis of (A) ICONCI and EDCI of CI results, (B) ICONSV and EDSV of SV results, (C) ICONSVI and EDSVI of SVI results, (D) ICONSVR and EDSVR of SVR results, (E) ICONDO2I and EDDO2I of DO2 results.

Table 4. The studied parameters in the base line time (T1), T3, T4, and T5 by the two methods.