2,101
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Space use, habitat selection and browsing effects of red deer in Sardinia

, , , , &
Pages 179-189 | Received 22 Mar 2006, Accepted 28 Sep 2006, Published online: 05 Jun 2007

Figures & data

Figure 1. Estimates of deer numbers between 1989 and 1998.

Figure 1. Estimates of deer numbers between 1989 and 1998.

Figure 2. Mean bimonthly home range sizes measured with different MCP estimates(100%, 95%, 50%) of adult (A) and subadult (B) hinds in 1997 and 1998. Vertical bars represent standard deviations.

Figure 2. Mean bimonthly home range sizes measured with different MCP estimates(100%, 95%, 50%) of adult (A) and subadult (B) hinds in 1997 and 1998. Vertical bars represent standard deviations.

Table I. Seasonal home range (MCP100%) overlap between preceding and following seasons and vice versa.

Figure 3. Monthly number of tourists in the Reserve. FEB‐97 = February 1997; JAN‐98 = January 1998.

Figure 3. Monthly number of tourists in the Reserve. FEB‐97 = February 1997; JAN‐98 = January 1998.

Figure 4. Variation of mean home range sizes(ha) in days with no tourists and in those with tourists.

Figure 4. Variation of mean home range sizes(ha) in days with no tourists and in those with tourists.

Figure 5. Annual habitat selection(Ivlev index; third level, Johnson Citation1980).

Figure 5. Annual habitat selection(Ivlev index; third level, Johnson Citation1980).

Table II. Seasonal preference index (Ivlev, third level, see Johnson Citation1980). SF = subadult females, AF = adult females; M = male M1.

Table III. Preferences for browsed species, in different seasons. In parentheses, the standardized Ivlev's selectivity index for each species (see Methods).

Table IV. Selectivity (Ivlev's index) of different vegetation types, in each season. A = availability; U = use.

Figure 6. Browsed plants in relation to their overall abundance. For each species is reported the percentage of plants browsed in relation to the total number of plants recorded.

Figure 6. Browsed plants in relation to their overall abundance. For each species is reported the percentage of plants browsed in relation to the total number of plants recorded.

Figure 7. Proportion of shrub/tree species killed by browsing in each habitat.

Figure 7. Proportion of shrub/tree species killed by browsing in each habitat.

Figure 8. Monthly variations in the relationships between number of browsed plants(trees and scrubs) and height of herbaceous layer associations. Browsing frequency was low when the herbaceous vegetation peaked. Data on availability of grass associations are from the Monte Arcosu WWF Reserve archive.

Figure 8. Monthly variations in the relationships between number of browsed plants(trees and scrubs) and height of herbaceous layer associations. Browsing frequency was low when the herbaceous vegetation peaked. Data on availability of grass associations are from the Monte Arcosu WWF Reserve archive.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.