Methods for the 2019 New Zealand family violence study- a study on the association between violence exposure, health and well-being

Figures & data

Table 1. 2019 New Zealand Family Violence Survey: questionnaire domains.

Section 0    Consent and Household characteristics

Section 1    Respondent and Community

Section 2    General Health

Section 3    Reproductive Health

Section 4    Children

Section 5    Current or Most Recent Partner

Section 6    Attitudes

Section 7    Respondent and Partner

Section 8    Injuries

Section 9    Impact and Coping

Section 10 Other Experiences

Section 11 Financial Autonomy

Section 12 Completion of Interview

Figure 1. 2019 New Zealand Family Violence Survey: flowchart of household and individual recruitment outcomes.

Table 2. 2019 New Zealand Family Violence Survey: Household and individual response rates by sex of participant.

	Female n (%)	Male n (%)
Number of households approached	4814	4753
Number of households who agreed to participate (% of eligible)	3013 (62.6)	3218 (67.7)
Number of individuals eligible	2346	2363
Number of individuals agreed to participate (% of eligible)	1495 (63.7)	1449 (61.3)

Table 3. 2019 New Zealand Family Violence Survey: response rates by household deprivation level and sex of participant.

Area level deprivation	Female		Male
	Household invited N	Household agreed N (%)	Household invited N	Household agreed N (%)
Least deprived	1412	894 (63.3)	1204	796 (66.1)
Moderately deprived	1837	1181 (64.2)	1957	1339 (68.4)
Most deprived	1545	931 (60.3)	1527	1057 (69.2)
Area level deprivation	Number of individuals eligible N	Number of individuals agreed N (%)	Number of individuals eligible N	Number of individuals agreed N (%)
Least deprived	734	441 (60.0)	593	364 (61.4)
Moderately deprived	925	601 (65.0)	1044	654 (62.6)
Most deprived	682	449 (65.8)	708	421 (59.5)

Table 4. 2019 New Zealand Family Violence Survey: sample demographic characteristics compared with general population.

	NZ Population^1			Survey Sample
	Male %	Female %	Total %	Male n (%)	Female n (%)	Total n (%)
Gender	1,591,221 (48.0)	1,725,039 (52.0)	3,316,257	1423 (49.3)	1464 (50.7)	2887
Age groups
16–19	7.6	6.7	7.10	55 (3.9)	41 (2.8)	97 (3.4)
20–29	17.0	16.1	17.0	153 (10.8)	140 (9.6)	293 (10.2)
30–39	15.6	16.0	15.8	217 (15.3)	224 (15.3)	441 (15.3)
40–49	18.1	18.5	18.3	266 (18.7)	254 (17.4)	520 (18.03)
50–59	17.0	16.8	16.9	277 (19.5)	282 (19.3)	559 (19.4)
60–69	13.2	12.7	12.9	236 (16.6)	268 (18.3)	504 (17.5)
70–79	7.6	7.8	7.7	155 (10.9)	188 (12.9)	343 (11.9)
≥ 80	3.9	5.4	4.7	62 (4.4)	65 (4.4)	127 (4.4)
Ethnicity^a
Māori	11.4	11.7	12.0	129 (9.0)	188 (12.8)	318 (11.0)
Pasifika	5.6	5.6	5.6	88 (6.2)	71 (4.8)	159 (5.5)
Asian	10.9	11.2	11.1	218 (15.3)	160 (10.9)	378 (13.1)
MELAA	1.0	1.0	1.0	23 (1.6)	22 (1.5)	45 (1.5)
European	70	70.7	71.3	963 (67.8)	1021 (69.8)	1984 (68.8)
Area level deprivation tertiles^b	Only %
Least deprived	31.6	31.1	30.0	25.6	29.0	27.3
Moderately deprived	39.8	39.7	40.0	45.5	40.7	43.1
Most deprived	28.5	29.0	30.0	28.8	30.2	29.5

¹ Census 2013.

^a Prioritised ethnicity.

^b Index of Multiple Deprivation (Exeter et al. 2017).

Exeter DJ, Zhao J, Lee A, Browne M. 2017. The New Zealand Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD): a new suite of indicator for social and health research in Aotearoa New Zealand. PLoS ONE. 12:e0181260.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar