362
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Themed Section: Deindustrialisation and Geographical Political Economy

A geographical political economy response to commentaries on ‘Coping with deindustrialization in the global North and South’

ORCID Icon
Pages 45-52 | Received 22 Mar 2021, Accepted 24 Mar 2021, Published online: 02 Apr 2021
 

ABSTRACT

This article articulates the thoughts and responses provoked by the welcome and constructively critical and thoughtful commentaries. They are grouped around the following themes: the purpose of concepts and theories; fragmentation and pluralism; explaining temporal and geographical complexity, difference and change; and situating origins, histories, geographies and politics. The argument is that Geographical Political Economy (GPE) provides one approach amongst others and can further evolve through continued openness to constructive critical engagement, dialogue and mutual learning in grappling with deindustrialization and other phenomena in a global setting.

Highlights

  • Geographical political economy (GPE) provides one approach amongst others to grappling with deindustrialization in a global setting

  • GPE can further evolve through continued openness to constructive critical engagement, dialogue and mutual learning in the global North and South

  • Understanding and explaining the differentiated geographical expressions of deindustrialization across the world can benefit from reflecting on the purpose of concepts and theories and the meaning and purpose of pluralism

  • GPE provides one way to explaining temporal and geographical complexity, difference and change

  • Situating GPE’s origins, histories, geographies and politics are integral to its use and further evolution

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Jung Won Sonn as the journal’s editor for the invitation to contribute and respond to the commentaries. Thanks also to Jennifer Clark, Robert Hassink, Lin-Fang Hsu and Jung Won Sonn (again) for their thoughtful engagement with the article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Economic and Social Research Council [grant number ES/N0006135/1,ES/P003923/1].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 282.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.