2,081
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of Cyberlindnera fabianii in Korea

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 449-456 | Received 17 May 2019, Accepted 31 Jul 2019, Published online: 03 Sep 2019

Figures & data

Table 1. Medical history of the patients for the isolates used in this study.

Figure 1. Cyberlindnera fabianii. (a) and (b) budding cells, (c) pseudohyphae. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Figure 1. Cyberlindnera fabianii. (a) and (b) budding cells, (c) pseudohyphae. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree inferred from neighbor-joining analysis of the he D1/D2 region of the large subunit (LSU) sequences from Cyberlindnera fabianii species. The nodal significance was evaluated by means of bootstrapping performed using 1000 replicates.

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree inferred from neighbor-joining analysis of the he D1/D2 region of the large subunit (LSU) sequences from Cyberlindnera fabianii species. The nodal significance was evaluated by means of bootstrapping performed using 1000 replicates.

Table 2 Antifungal susceptibility testing of Cyberlindnera fabianii (n = 11) using Sensititre YeastOneTM YO10.

Figure 3. The comparison of MALDI-TOF profiles of Candida and its related species. The species used in the comparison were Cy. fabianii, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. pelliculosa, C. tropicalis and C. utilis and MALDI-TOF profiles of each species were presented from left to right. MALDI-TOF profiles mainly between m/z 4000 and 12000 were compared. MicoIDSys MALDI-TOF system was used for this comparison.

Figure 3. The comparison of MALDI-TOF profiles of Candida and its related species. The species used in the comparison were Cy. fabianii, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. pelliculosa, C. tropicalis and C. utilis and MALDI-TOF profiles of each species were presented from left to right. MALDI-TOF profiles mainly between m/z 4000 and 12000 were compared. MicoIDSys MALDI-TOF system was used for this comparison.

Figure 4. The ITS alignment of Cyberlindnera fabianii and NAC strains.

Figure 4. The ITS alignment of Cyberlindnera fabianii and NAC strains.