2,058
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles; Agriculture and Environmental Biotechnology

Clonal in vitro multiplication of grey mangrove and assessment of genetic fidelity using single primer amplification reaction (SPAR) methods

, , , &
Pages 1069-1074 | Received 30 Mar 2015, Accepted 15 Jun 2015, Published online: 16 Jul 2015

Figures & data

Table 1. Effect of IBA on root formation from in vitro raised shoots of A. marina in the MS medium after 4 weeks of culturing.

Table 2. RAPD primers used to evaluate the extent of genetic fidelity of micropropagated Avicennia marina plantlets.

Table 3. DAMD primers used to evaluate the extent of genetic fidelity of micropropagated Avicennia marina plantlets.

Table 4. ISSR primers used to evaluate the extent of genetic fidelity of micropropagated Avicennia marina plantlets.

Figure 1. Effect of 6-benzyladenine (BA) on shoot regeneration (%) of A. marina in the MS medium augmented with NAA (1.0 μmol/L) + AC (3.0 g/L). Data represent means ± SEM. Values followed by the same letter within response variables are not significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Tukey's test.

Figure 1. Effect of 6-benzyladenine (BA) on shoot regeneration (%) of A. marina in the MS medium augmented with NAA (1.0 μmol/L) + AC (3.0 g/L). Data represent means ± SEM. Values followed by the same letter within response variables are not significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Tukey's test.

Figure 2. Effect of 6-benzyladenine (BA) on in vitro shoot multiplication and shoot length of A. marina in the MS medium augmented with NAA (1.0 μmol/L) + AC (3.0 g/L). Data represent means ± SEM. Values followed by the same letter within response variables are not significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Tukey's test.

Figure 2. Effect of 6-benzyladenine (BA) on in vitro shoot multiplication and shoot length of A. marina in the MS medium augmented with NAA (1.0 μmol/L) + AC (3.0 g/L). Data represent means ± SEM. Values followed by the same letter within response variables are not significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Tukey's test.

Figure 3. Representative RAPD profiles of in vitro raised and donor plants of A. marina generated using primer OPB-07. Lanes 1–10: randomly selected regenerated plants; lane D: donor plant; lane M: lambda DNA/EcoRI+HindIII marker (Cat no. SM0193; Fermentas, GmbH, Germany).

Figure 3. Representative RAPD profiles of in vitro raised and donor plants of A. marina generated using primer OPB-07. Lanes 1–10: randomly selected regenerated plants; lane D: donor plant; lane M: lambda DNA/EcoRI+HindIII marker (Cat no. SM0193; Fermentas, GmbH, Germany).

Figure 4. Representative DAMD profiles of in vitro raised and donor plants of A. marina generated using primer 33.6. Lanes 1–10: randomly selected regenerated plants; lane D: donor plant; lane M: lambda DNA/EcoRI+HindIII marker.

Figure 4. Representative DAMD profiles of in vitro raised and donor plants of A. marina generated using primer 33.6. Lanes 1–10: randomly selected regenerated plants; lane D: donor plant; lane M: lambda DNA/EcoRI+HindIII marker.

Figure 5. Representative ISSR profiles of in vitro raised and donor plants of A. marina generated using primer UBC-866. Lanes 1–10: randomly selected regenerated plants; lane D: donor plant; lane M: lambda DNA/EcoRI+HindIII marker.

Figure 5. Representative ISSR profiles of in vitro raised and donor plants of A. marina generated using primer UBC-866. Lanes 1–10: randomly selected regenerated plants; lane D: donor plant; lane M: lambda DNA/EcoRI+HindIII marker.