2,894
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles; Medical Biotechnology

Comparison of linear and angular measurements in CBCT scans using 2D and 3D rendering software

, , , &
Pages 777-784 | Received 24 Oct 2015, Accepted 31 Mar 2016, Published online: 27 Apr 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. General layout of the Vista Dent OC software showing the cephalometric analysis.

Figure 1. General layout of the Vista Dent OC software showing the cephalometric analysis.

Figure 2. Image showing (a) 3D generated skull representation, and (b) generated cephalograms measurements in Maxilim software, (c) cephalometric measurements in In vivo and (d) Romexis software packages.

Figure 2. Image showing (a) 3D generated skull representation, and (b) generated cephalograms measurements in Maxilim software, (c) cephalometric measurements in In vivo and (d) Romexis software packages.

Table 1. The list of landmarks and cephalometric measurements that were used in the study.

Table 2. Intra-observer reliability for all tracing methods.

Table 3. Intra-class correlation coefficients for all tracings.

Table 4. Analysis of mean differences for 2D and 3D measurements according all tracing methods.