Figures & data
Figure 1. Effects of ginsenoside CK on the neurobehavioural score and brain water content in rats. Note. Values are means ± SD (n = 6). Compared with the Sham group, **P < 0.01; compared with the I/R group, # P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01.
![Figure 1. Effects of ginsenoside CK on the neurobehavioural score and brain water content in rats. Note. Values are means ± SD (n = 6). Compared with the Sham group, **P < 0.01; compared with the I/R group, # P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01.](/cms/asset/0fdc87e6-5d3f-4cca-9b3a-7a47ec2bedd4/tbeq_a_1525323_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Effect of ginsenoside CK on the infarct volume ratio of rats. Note: Values are means ± SD (n = 6). Compared with the Sham group, **P < 0.01; compared with the I/R group, # P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01.
![Figure 2. Effect of ginsenoside CK on the infarct volume ratio of rats. Note: Values are means ± SD (n = 6). Compared with the Sham group, **P < 0.01; compared with the I/R group, # P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01.](/cms/asset/a075bcfa-5de4-4f85-b5a2-a55eea0a269a/tbeq_a_1525323_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Antioxidant effect of ginsenoside CK in the brain tissue of rats. Note: Values are means ± SD (n = 6). Compared with the Sham group, **P < 0.01; compared with the I/R group, # P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01.
![Figure 3. Antioxidant effect of ginsenoside CK in the brain tissue of rats. Note: Values are means ± SD (n = 6). Compared with the Sham group, **P < 0.01; compared with the I/R group, # P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01.](/cms/asset/7bb2aaf5-79ce-4d59-8fa5-046352c0520b/tbeq_a_1525323_f0003_b.jpg)