Figures & data
Figure 1. General scheme of marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB) for the conversion of normal maize inbred line UMI 1200 into QPM version using the donor VQL 1. RP: recurrent parent (UMI 1200); DP: donor parent (VQL 1); A: homozygous allele to recurrent; B: homozygous allele to donor; H: heterozygous allele. Three levels of selection were carried out in developing the QPM version of UMI 1200: (i) foreground selection to select the plants with target allele o2; (ii) background selection to recover maximum RPG recovery; (iii) phenotypic selection for agronomic traits and endosperm modification.
![Figure 1. General scheme of marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB) for the conversion of normal maize inbred line UMI 1200 into QPM version using the donor VQL 1. RP: recurrent parent (UMI 1200); DP: donor parent (VQL 1); A: homozygous allele to recurrent; B: homozygous allele to donor; H: heterozygous allele. Three levels of selection were carried out in developing the QPM version of UMI 1200: (i) foreground selection to select the plants with target allele o2; (ii) background selection to recover maximum RPG recovery; (iii) phenotypic selection for agronomic traits and endosperm modification.](/cms/asset/95c92bcf-928a-4083-a9e0-2fcea6bbfd6c/tbeq_a_1556121_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Foreground screening of F1, BC1F1, BC2F1 and BC2F2 individuals of UMI 1200 × VQL 1 using umc1066 primer. (A) Foreground selection in F1 individuals; lanes 1–16, F1 progenies. (B) Foreground selection in BC1F1 individuals; lanes 1–16, BC1 F1 progenies. (C) Foreground selection in BC2F1 individuals; lanes 1–17, BC1 F2 progenies. (D) Foreground selection in BC2F2 individuals; lanes 1–17, BC2 F2 progenies. M: 100 bp ladder; P1: UMI 1200; P2: VQL 1.
![Figure 2. Foreground screening of F1, BC1F1, BC2F1 and BC2F2 individuals of UMI 1200 × VQL 1 using umc1066 primer. (A) Foreground selection in F1 individuals; lanes 1–16, F1 progenies. (B) Foreground selection in BC1F1 individuals; lanes 1–16, BC1 F1 progenies. (C) Foreground selection in BC2F1 individuals; lanes 1–17, BC1 F2 progenies. (D) Foreground selection in BC2F2 individuals; lanes 1–17, BC2 F2 progenies. M: 100 bp ladder; P1: UMI 1200; P2: VQL 1.](/cms/asset/950af9b5-5da4-4b9a-a48a-430aaa8a48ec/tbeq_a_1556121_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1. Segregation pattern of the o2 allele in backcross and selfed generations of cross UMI 1200 × VQL 1.
Figure 3. Background selection in selected individuals. Amplification with: umc1710 in BC2F1 (A); umc2101 BC1F1 (B); umc1026 in BC2F2 (C); umc1060 in BC2F2 (D); umc1924 in BC2F2 (E); umc1827 in BC2F2 (F); umc2143 in BC2F2 (G); umc1857 in BC2F2 (H); umc1185 in BC2F2 (I); nc012 in BC2F2 (J). M: 100 bp ladder; P1: UMI 1200; P2: VQL 1; Lane Citation1: DBT4-1-/25-10/25-10/25-16; Lane Citation2: DBT4-1-/25-10/25-17/25-11; Lane Citation3: DBT4-1-/25-10/25-17/25-13. The plant was scored AA if it contains the UMI 1200 allele, as BB if it contains the VQL 1 allele and as AB if it contains both UMI 1200 allele and VQL 1 allele (i.e. heterozygotes).
![Figure 3. Background selection in selected individuals. Amplification with: umc1710 in BC2F1 (A); umc2101 BC1F1 (B); umc1026 in BC2F2 (C); umc1060 in BC2F2 (D); umc1924 in BC2F2 (E); umc1827 in BC2F2 (F); umc2143 in BC2F2 (G); umc1857 in BC2F2 (H); umc1185 in BC2F2 (I); nc012 in BC2F2 (J). M: 100 bp ladder; P1: UMI 1200; P2: VQL 1; Lane Citation1: DBT4-1-/25-10/25-10/25-16; Lane Citation2: DBT4-1-/25-10/25-17/25-11; Lane Citation3: DBT4-1-/25-10/25-17/25-13. The plant was scored AA if it contains the UMI 1200 allele, as BB if it contains the VQL 1 allele and as AB if it contains both UMI 1200 allele and VQL 1 allele (i.e. heterozygotes).](/cms/asset/d1315719-35fd-40e4-bfc9-8109c98fa5f5/tbeq_a_1556121_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 2. Recovery percentage of recurrent parent genome (RPG) in backcross populations of cross UMI 1200 × VQL 1.
Figure 4. Endosperm modification in kernels observed through transmitted light. Varying degrees of opaqueness indicate varying levels of endosperm modification; 25% modified seeds from the selected cobs were forwarded to the next generation from BC2F1.
![Figure 4. Endosperm modification in kernels observed through transmitted light. Varying degrees of opaqueness indicate varying levels of endosperm modification; 25% modified seeds from the selected cobs were forwarded to the next generation from BC2F1.](/cms/asset/e1c62796-06b6-46b4-a59f-9b6bb69f9e7e/tbeq_a_1556121_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 3. Recovery percentage for morphological traits of BC2F2 progenies in comparison with recurrent and donor parents.