Figures & data
Figure 1. Curve of B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 growth (A) and the effects of the CFS on Fon mycelial growth (B). 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 48 h, 60 h and 72 h: the CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 in relation to the incubation time.
![Figure 1. Curve of B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 growth (A) and the effects of the CFS on Fon mycelial growth (B). 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 48 h, 60 h and 72 h: the CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 in relation to the incubation time.](/cms/asset/a4959758-a9ca-4cf1-bf65-5838e5139d78/tbeq_a_1637279_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. SEM and TEM micrographs of Fon conidia treated with the CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01: (A) 50% CFS from LB medium at 72 h (SEM), (B) 50% CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 at 72 h (SEM), (C) 75% CFS from LB medium at 72 h (SEM), (D) 75% CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 at 72 h (SEM), (E) 50% CFS from LB medium at 72 h (TEM), (F) 50% CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 at 72 h (TEM), (G) 75% CFS from LB medium at 72 h (TEM), (H) 75% CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 at 72 h (TEM).
![Figure 2. SEM and TEM micrographs of Fon conidia treated with the CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01: (A) 50% CFS from LB medium at 72 h (SEM), (B) 50% CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 at 72 h (SEM), (C) 75% CFS from LB medium at 72 h (SEM), (D) 75% CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 at 72 h (SEM), (E) 50% CFS from LB medium at 72 h (TEM), (F) 50% CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 at 72 h (TEM), (G) 75% CFS from LB medium at 72 h (TEM), (H) 75% CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 at 72 h (TEM).](/cms/asset/18bba1c3-fd16-4484-8823-0c26c2d1ebc8/tbeq_a_1637279_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Confocal laser scanning micrographs of Fon conidia and mycelia treated with the CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 and LB medium: CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 for 12 h (A), 24 h (B), 36 h (C) and 48 h (D) vs. CFS from LB medium for 12 h (E), 24 h (F), 36 h (G) and 48 h (H).
![Figure 3. Confocal laser scanning micrographs of Fon conidia and mycelia treated with the CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 and LB medium: CFS from B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 for 12 h (A), 24 h (B), 36 h (C) and 48 h (D) vs. CFS from LB medium for 12 h (E), 24 h (F), 36 h (G) and 48 h (H).](/cms/asset/0b27b11a-4925-4676-b24c-5fef1e75aedd/tbeq_a_1637279_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Principle component analysis (A) and (orthogonal) partial least squares discriminant analysis (B, C and D) score plots of the datasets obtained by the LC-MS and UHPLC-LTQ Orbitrap MS analysis of B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 and its growth medium. The quality of the (O)PLS-DA models was evaluated by R2X, R2Y, Q2Y and p values and validated by 200 permutation tests.
![Figure 4. Principle component analysis (A) and (orthogonal) partial least squares discriminant analysis (B, C and D) score plots of the datasets obtained by the LC-MS and UHPLC-LTQ Orbitrap MS analysis of B. amyloliquefaciens LZN01 and its growth medium. The quality of the (O)PLS-DA models was evaluated by R2X, R2Y, Q2Y and p values and validated by 200 permutation tests.](/cms/asset/9f1d201c-fed4-4193-b9ec-6210de7fef06/tbeq_a_1637279_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Effects of myriocin (A), 3-methyl-2-oxovaleric acid (B) and gabapentin (C) on the mycelial growth of Fon.
![Figure 6. Effects of myriocin (A), 3-methyl-2-oxovaleric acid (B) and gabapentin (C) on the mycelial growth of Fon.](/cms/asset/597214f8-1558-499b-8371-161dfea3eee5/tbeq_a_1637279_f0006_c.jpg)