Figures & data
Figure 1. Expression of miR-449a in IBD. The expression level of miR-449a in IBD was detected using qRT-PCR. A: Relative miR-449a expression in colonic mucosa of 30 children with IBD or 30 children without IBD (** p < 0.01 vs. non-IBD); B: Relative miR-449a in the normal intestinal epithelial cells Caco-2 treated with or without DSS (**p < 0.01 vs. Control group). Data are displayed as mean values ± SD.
![Figure 1. Expression of miR-449a in IBD. The expression level of miR-449a in IBD was detected using qRT-PCR. A: Relative miR-449a expression in colonic mucosa of 30 children with IBD or 30 children without IBD (** p < 0.01 vs. non-IBD); B: Relative miR-449a in the normal intestinal epithelial cells Caco-2 treated with or without DSS (**p < 0.01 vs. Control group). Data are displayed as mean values ± SD.](/cms/asset/5ef07b96-10f1-441b-93ee-cc9cd6d7ac46/tbeq_a_1724828_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Notch1 was a direct target of miR-449a. A: Interaction between miR-449a and 3’UTR of Notch1 was predicted using microRNA target site prediction software; B: Luciferase activity of a reporter containing a wild-type Notch1 3’UTR or a mutant Notch1 3’UTR are presented. “Notch1-MUT” indicates the Notch1 3’UTR with a mutation in the miR-449a binding site. UTR, untranslated region. All data are presented as mean values ± SD of three independent experiments. **p < 0.01 vs. mimic control group.
![Figure 2. Notch1 was a direct target of miR-449a. A: Interaction between miR-449a and 3’UTR of Notch1 was predicted using microRNA target site prediction software; B: Luciferase activity of a reporter containing a wild-type Notch1 3’UTR or a mutant Notch1 3’UTR are presented. “Notch1-MUT” indicates the Notch1 3’UTR with a mutation in the miR-449a binding site. UTR, untranslated region. All data are presented as mean values ± SD of three independent experiments. **p < 0.01 vs. mimic control group.](/cms/asset/4db4d48a-4237-41e3-8e2a-c6918f0dc294/tbeq_a_1724828_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. miR-449a inhibitor increased Notch1 expression in Caco-2 cells. A: Relative miR-449a expression in Caco-2 cells in different groups; B and D: Relative Notch1 mRNA expression in Caco-2 cells in different groups; C and E: Protein level of Notch1 in Caco-2 cells in different groups. Data are displayed as mean values ± SD. ** p < 0.01 vs. control group; # p < 0.05 vs. inhibitor group.
![Figure 3. miR-449a inhibitor increased Notch1 expression in Caco-2 cells. A: Relative miR-449a expression in Caco-2 cells in different groups; B and D: Relative Notch1 mRNA expression in Caco-2 cells in different groups; C and E: Protein level of Notch1 in Caco-2 cells in different groups. Data are displayed as mean values ± SD. ** p < 0.01 vs. control group; # p < 0.05 vs. inhibitor group.](/cms/asset/dbf7e3a4-ddd4-4838-b9db-b2cf558c6d5a/tbeq_a_1724828_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Effect of miR-449a inhibitor on TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 expression in Caco-2 cells. After specific treatment, the mRNA (A–C) and protein (D) level of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in Caco-2 cells in different groups was detected using qRT-PCR and western blot, respectively. Control: Caco-2 cells without any treatment; DSS: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS; DSS + NC: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with the negative control of miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor + siRNA: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and co-transfected with miR-449a inhibitor and Notch1-siRNA. Data are displayed as mean values ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. control group; #p < 0.05 vs. DSS group; &p < 0.05 vs. DSS + inhibitor group.
![Figure 4. Effect of miR-449a inhibitor on TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 expression in Caco-2 cells. After specific treatment, the mRNA (A–C) and protein (D) level of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in Caco-2 cells in different groups was detected using qRT-PCR and western blot, respectively. Control: Caco-2 cells without any treatment; DSS: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS; DSS + NC: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with the negative control of miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor + siRNA: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and co-transfected with miR-449a inhibitor and Notch1-siRNA. Data are displayed as mean values ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. control group; #p < 0.05 vs. DSS group; &p < 0.05 vs. DSS + inhibitor group.](/cms/asset/baded5bd-61e0-4d22-b155-e996b26fa423/tbeq_a_1724828_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Effect of miR-449a inhibitor on Caco-2 cell proliferation ability. After specific treatment, Caco-2 cell proliferation ability was assessed by using MTT assay. Control: Caco-2 cells without any treatment; DSS: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS; DSS + NC: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with the negative control of miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor + siRNA: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and co-transfected with miR-449a inhibitor and Notch1-siRNA.Data are displayed as mean values ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. control group; #p < 0.05 vs. DSS group; &p < 0.05 vs. DSS + inhibitor group.
![Figure 5. Effect of miR-449a inhibitor on Caco-2 cell proliferation ability. After specific treatment, Caco-2 cell proliferation ability was assessed by using MTT assay. Control: Caco-2 cells without any treatment; DSS: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS; DSS + NC: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with the negative control of miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor + siRNA: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and co-transfected with miR-449a inhibitor and Notch1-siRNA.Data are displayed as mean values ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. control group; #p < 0.05 vs. DSS group; &p < 0.05 vs. DSS + inhibitor group.](/cms/asset/3428fef0-6e3a-4468-a6de-e5e1e08d7587/tbeq_a_1724828_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6. Effect of miR-449a inhibitor on Caco-2 cell apoptosis. After specific treatment, Caco-2 cell apoptosis (early apoptosis + late apoptosis) was assessed by using FCM assay (A), and the data were analyzed (B). C: protein level of Bcl-2 and Bax in different groups. Control: Caco-2 cells without any treatment; DSS: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS; DSS + NC: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with the negative control of miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor + siRNA: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and co-transfected with miR-449a inhibitor and Notch1-siRNA.Data were displayed as mean ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. control group; #p < 0.05 vs. DSS group; &p < 0.05 vs. DSS + inhibitor group.
![Figure 6. Effect of miR-449a inhibitor on Caco-2 cell apoptosis. After specific treatment, Caco-2 cell apoptosis (early apoptosis + late apoptosis) was assessed by using FCM assay (A), and the data were analyzed (B). C: protein level of Bcl-2 and Bax in different groups. Control: Caco-2 cells without any treatment; DSS: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS; DSS + NC: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with the negative control of miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor + siRNA: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and co-transfected with miR-449a inhibitor and Notch1-siRNA.Data were displayed as mean ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. control group; #p < 0.05 vs. DSS group; &p < 0.05 vs. DSS + inhibitor group.](/cms/asset/ac575bca-1c96-423c-81d6-a102c7d44def/tbeq_a_1724828_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7. Effect of miR-449a inhibitor on Notch1 pathway in Caco-2 cells. After specific treatment, the protein (A) and mRNA (B–D) level of Notch1, Hes-1 and Hey-1 in Caco-2 cells in different groups was detected using western blot and qRT-PCR, respectively. Control: Caco-2 cells without any treatment; DSS: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS; DSS + NC: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with the negative control of miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor + siRNA: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and co-transfected with miR-449a inhibitor and Notch1-siRNA. Data are displayed as mean values ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. control group; #, ##p < 0.05, 0.01 vs. DSS group; &p < 0.05 vs. DSS + inhibitor group.
![Figure 7. Effect of miR-449a inhibitor on Notch1 pathway in Caco-2 cells. After specific treatment, the protein (A) and mRNA (B–D) level of Notch1, Hes-1 and Hey-1 in Caco-2 cells in different groups was detected using western blot and qRT-PCR, respectively. Control: Caco-2 cells without any treatment; DSS: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS; DSS + NC: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with the negative control of miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and transfected with miR-449a inhibitor; DSS + inhibitor + siRNA: Caco-2 cells were treated with 2% DSS and co-transfected with miR-449a inhibitor and Notch1-siRNA. Data are displayed as mean values ± SD. **p < 0.01 vs. control group; #, ##p < 0.05, 0.01 vs. DSS group; &p < 0.05 vs. DSS + inhibitor group.](/cms/asset/453d3cde-1aee-486b-b610-d4d0ef17f9b3/tbeq_a_1724828_f0007_b.jpg)