Figures & data
Figure 1. Relative transcript level in T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE (A) and MtGRAS7RNAi (B) compared to WT plants. Data represent the mean values ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared to the control: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 1. Relative transcript level in T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE (A) and MtGRAS7RNAi (B) compared to WT plants. Data represent the mean values ± SEM (n = 3). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared to the control: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/35b46075-289d-4d7d-a43c-e427a1a88204/tbeq_a_2074893_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Phenotype comparison of T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants. Shape of root in WT, GRAS-OE and GRAS-RNAi (A); distribution of nodules in WT, GRAS-OE and GRAS-RNAi (B); shape of flowers and pods in WT, GRAS-OE and GRAS-RNAi (C).
![Figure 2. Phenotype comparison of T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants. Shape of root in WT, GRAS-OE and GRAS-RNAi (A); distribution of nodules in WT, GRAS-OE and GRAS-RNAi (B); shape of flowers and pods in WT, GRAS-OE and GRAS-RNAi (C).](/cms/asset/1edc382e-f30b-4092-b017-755c4e4fc9ce/tbeq_a_2074893_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Plant architecture of T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants.
![Figure 3. Plant architecture of T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants.](/cms/asset/db12d7df-8f8e-4b81-9ddc-f63be7069d46/tbeq_a_2074893_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Relative transcript level of MtGRAS7 in T1 transgenic lines with modified expression of MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants after stress induced by 350 mmol/L mannitol treatment for 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. Leaves (A); Nodules (B). Data represent the mean level of expression of three independent transgenic lines and three control plants ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 4. Relative transcript level of MtGRAS7 in T1 transgenic lines with modified expression of MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants after stress induced by 350 mmol/L mannitol treatment for 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. Leaves (A); Nodules (B). Data represent the mean level of expression of three independent transgenic lines and three control plants ± SEM. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/a32eb061-2178-4835-b812-8a3ad666b87a/tbeq_a_2074893_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. Relative transcript level of MtGRAS7 in T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants after stress induced by 150 mmol/L NaCl treatment for 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. Leaves (A); Nodules (B). Data represent the mean level of expression of three independent transgenic lines and three control plants ± SEM. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 5. Relative transcript level of MtGRAS7 in T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants after stress induced by 150 mmol/L NaCl treatment for 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. Leaves (A); Nodules (B). Data represent the mean level of expression of three independent transgenic lines and three control plants ± SEM. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/ca301753-2a85-4ffa-8819-340f8e646a0c/tbeq_a_2074893_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6. Seed production of MtGRAS7OE transgenic lines with modified expression and control 2HA-Wt after application of drought and salinity stress.
![Figure 6. Seed production of MtGRAS7OE transgenic lines with modified expression and control 2HA-Wt after application of drought and salinity stress.](/cms/asset/f64f3512-17b1-4fbc-9832-83da27c6759a/tbeq_a_2074893_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7. Relative transcript level of MtGRAS7 in T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants after stress induced by cold (4 °C) for 0 h, 72 h and 7 days; R, recovery period of one week. Data represent the mean level of expression of three independent transgenic lines and three control plants ± SEM. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
![Figure 7. Relative transcript level of MtGRAS7 in T1 transgenic lines with modified expression MtGRAS7OE and MtGRAS7RNAi compared to WT plants after stress induced by cold (4 °C) for 0 h, 72 h and 7 days; R, recovery period of one week. Data represent the mean level of expression of three independent transgenic lines and three control plants ± SEM. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/1b063f4a-144d-4061-98ec-d17528f21eab/tbeq_a_2074893_f0007_b.jpg)
Supplemental Material
Download PDF (665.9 KB)Data availability
All data that support the findings reported in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.